Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Financial Times-UK) Simon Schama - Criticism of Israeli government policies has mutated into a rejection of Israel's right to exist. What we are dealing with is, in Professor Alan Johnson's accurate coinage, "anti-Semitic anti-Zionism." When the international Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement singles out Israel as the perpetrator of the world's worst iniquities, notwithstanding its right of self-defense, it is legitimate to ask why the critics' wrath does not extend, for example, to Russia which rains down destruction on civilian populations in Syria? Why is it somehow proper to boycott Israeli academics and cultural institutions, many of which are critical of government policy, but to remain passive in the face of Saudi Arabia's brutal punishment of anyone whose exercise of freedom of conscience can be judged sacrilegious? Why is the rage so conspicuously selective? Or, to put it another way, why is it so much easier to hate the Jews? We have to worry about those who, in their indignation at the sufferings visited on the Palestinians, and their indifference to almost-daily stabbings in the streets of Israel, have discovered the excitement of saying the unspeakable, making hay with history, so Israel is the new reich, and a military attack on Gaza indistinguishable from the industrially processed incineration of millions. Enter the historian. And history says this: anti-Semitism has not been caused by Zionism; it is precisely the other way round. Israel was caused by the centuries-long dehumanization of the Jews. For the Jews, the modern world turned out to be a lose-lose proposition. To characterize the country in which the language, the religion and the cultural identity of the Jews was formed as purely a colonial anomaly is the product of historical innocence. The writer, an English historian, is Professor of History and Art History at Columbia University in New York.2016-03-09 00:00:00Full Article
Anti-Semitic Anti-Zionism
(Financial Times-UK) Simon Schama - Criticism of Israeli government policies has mutated into a rejection of Israel's right to exist. What we are dealing with is, in Professor Alan Johnson's accurate coinage, "anti-Semitic anti-Zionism." When the international Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement singles out Israel as the perpetrator of the world's worst iniquities, notwithstanding its right of self-defense, it is legitimate to ask why the critics' wrath does not extend, for example, to Russia which rains down destruction on civilian populations in Syria? Why is it somehow proper to boycott Israeli academics and cultural institutions, many of which are critical of government policy, but to remain passive in the face of Saudi Arabia's brutal punishment of anyone whose exercise of freedom of conscience can be judged sacrilegious? Why is the rage so conspicuously selective? Or, to put it another way, why is it so much easier to hate the Jews? We have to worry about those who, in their indignation at the sufferings visited on the Palestinians, and their indifference to almost-daily stabbings in the streets of Israel, have discovered the excitement of saying the unspeakable, making hay with history, so Israel is the new reich, and a military attack on Gaza indistinguishable from the industrially processed incineration of millions. Enter the historian. And history says this: anti-Semitism has not been caused by Zionism; it is precisely the other way round. Israel was caused by the centuries-long dehumanization of the Jews. For the Jews, the modern world turned out to be a lose-lose proposition. To characterize the country in which the language, the religion and the cultural identity of the Jews was formed as purely a colonial anomaly is the product of historical innocence. The writer, an English historian, is Professor of History and Art History at Columbia University in New York.2016-03-09 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|