Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Strategic Assessment-Institute for National Security Studies) Shmuel Even - During negotiations with the Barak and Olmert governments (1999-2001 and 2006-2009, respectively), it became clear that the Palestinians do not recognize Israel as a Jewish state in principle. Moreover, Mahmoud Abbas' negotiators insist on the return of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians to Israel, first and foremost those in Lebanon. These positions reinforce the impression that Palestinians view negotiations as a strategy to wrest concessions from Israel without making any of their own. Experience has shown that Israeli initiatives did not advance the negotiations, and therefore there is little purpose in new Israeli initiatives that will not satisfy Palestinian demands and instead are apt to weaken Israel's position in the negotiations. The Palestinian claim that Egypt and Jordan were not required to recognize Israel as a Jewish state in their peace agreements is beside the point, because between these states and Israel there was no dispute over the territory comprising the Land of Israel, whereas with the Palestinians there must be an agreement not only between two states but also between two peoples. There is at present no common political horizon for a permanent agreement. A permanent agreement is contingent on waiting for the rise of a new local Palestinian leadership that will see the establishment of a Palestinian state in the territories as a priority that serves the welfare of its population, over the unrealistic demands that seek to undermine the Jewish identity of the State of Israel. The writer, a senior research fellow at INSS, retired from the IDF with the rank of colonel, following a long career in the IDF's Intelligence Branch. 2016-03-31 00:00:00Full Article
Do Israel and the Palestinians Share a Political Horizon?
(Strategic Assessment-Institute for National Security Studies) Shmuel Even - During negotiations with the Barak and Olmert governments (1999-2001 and 2006-2009, respectively), it became clear that the Palestinians do not recognize Israel as a Jewish state in principle. Moreover, Mahmoud Abbas' negotiators insist on the return of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians to Israel, first and foremost those in Lebanon. These positions reinforce the impression that Palestinians view negotiations as a strategy to wrest concessions from Israel without making any of their own. Experience has shown that Israeli initiatives did not advance the negotiations, and therefore there is little purpose in new Israeli initiatives that will not satisfy Palestinian demands and instead are apt to weaken Israel's position in the negotiations. The Palestinian claim that Egypt and Jordan were not required to recognize Israel as a Jewish state in their peace agreements is beside the point, because between these states and Israel there was no dispute over the territory comprising the Land of Israel, whereas with the Palestinians there must be an agreement not only between two states but also between two peoples. There is at present no common political horizon for a permanent agreement. A permanent agreement is contingent on waiting for the rise of a new local Palestinian leadership that will see the establishment of a Palestinian state in the territories as a priority that serves the welfare of its population, over the unrealistic demands that seek to undermine the Jewish identity of the State of Israel. The writer, a senior research fellow at INSS, retired from the IDF with the rank of colonel, following a long career in the IDF's Intelligence Branch. 2016-03-31 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|