Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Baker Institute) Michael Singh - There is scant evidence that engagement with the West by Iranian President Rouhani and Foreign Minister Zarif is changing Iran or its policies. In consenting to engage diplomatically, Iranian officials are doing so to further their own interests, which tend to stand in stark opposition to those of the U.S. and its allies. Given the strategic challenge that Iran poses to U.S. interests in the Middle East - in its support for terrorism and subversive non-state actors, threats to freedom of commerce and navigation in regional waterways, pursuit of a nuclear weapons capability, and other destabilizing pursuits - the American approach to diplomacy with Iran cannot simply consist of "engagement," but should be nested in a broader strategy to counter the challenges posed by Iran. The writer is managing director at The Washington Institute for Near East Policy.2016-05-03 00:00:00Full Article
One Year After the Nuclear Deal: Is Iran Moderating?
(Baker Institute) Michael Singh - There is scant evidence that engagement with the West by Iranian President Rouhani and Foreign Minister Zarif is changing Iran or its policies. In consenting to engage diplomatically, Iranian officials are doing so to further their own interests, which tend to stand in stark opposition to those of the U.S. and its allies. Given the strategic challenge that Iran poses to U.S. interests in the Middle East - in its support for terrorism and subversive non-state actors, threats to freedom of commerce and navigation in regional waterways, pursuit of a nuclear weapons capability, and other destabilizing pursuits - the American approach to diplomacy with Iran cannot simply consist of "engagement," but should be nested in a broader strategy to counter the challenges posed by Iran. The writer is managing director at The Washington Institute for Near East Policy.2016-05-03 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|