Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(National Interest) Kevin Reagan - The Orlando massacre and last December's San Bernardino attack highlight the unsettling reality that there are a plethora of soft targets in the U.S. and that ISIS and their ilk will not hesitate to engage them. In 2009, the Homeland Security Institute (HSI) published a report for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) contrasting the U.S. and Israeli approaches to informing and engaging their civilian populations on counterterrorism and national security. While acknowledging the differences in the nature of the terror threats faced by the two states, the report suggested a number of ways in which the U.S. could benefit from emulating the Israeli example. Terrorism preparedness in Israel is "a joint responsibility whereby government provides proper education to inform its citizens about the threat and survival tactics while the citizens assume responsibility to operationalize a national culture of preparedness as an able and willing partner in emergencies." In fostering a sense of civic responsibility and a culture of preparedness for terrorism from an early age, Israeli society is more accepting and proactive in preparing for attacks and thereby more resilient in recovering from them. 2016-06-15 00:00:00Full Article
After Orlando: What America Can Learn from Israel's Culture of Preparedness
(National Interest) Kevin Reagan - The Orlando massacre and last December's San Bernardino attack highlight the unsettling reality that there are a plethora of soft targets in the U.S. and that ISIS and their ilk will not hesitate to engage them. In 2009, the Homeland Security Institute (HSI) published a report for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) contrasting the U.S. and Israeli approaches to informing and engaging their civilian populations on counterterrorism and national security. While acknowledging the differences in the nature of the terror threats faced by the two states, the report suggested a number of ways in which the U.S. could benefit from emulating the Israeli example. Terrorism preparedness in Israel is "a joint responsibility whereby government provides proper education to inform its citizens about the threat and survival tactics while the citizens assume responsibility to operationalize a national culture of preparedness as an able and willing partner in emergencies." In fostering a sense of civic responsibility and a culture of preparedness for terrorism from an early age, Israeli society is more accepting and proactive in preparing for attacks and thereby more resilient in recovering from them. 2016-06-15 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|