Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Report) Emily B. Landau - When assessing the Iran nuclear deal that was signed almost a year ago, especially against the backdrop of Iran's defiant behavior and aggressive conduct in the Middle East since then, one can hardly be complacent about what was achieved. The partial constraints imposed on Iran's nuclear program do not reflect what the world powers set out to do; nor do they warrant surrendering the leverage over Iran afforded by the sanctions regime. Iran's behavior over the past year makes it clear that rather than embracing a more cooperative approach toward the international community, Iran is persisting with its abusive rhetoric and aggressive policies, including stepping up its presence in Syria and intensifying its ballistic missile activities. Indeed, Iran has been testing the resolve of the U.S. to confront it, equipped with a new and quite effective deterrent to any determined Western response: its threat to walk away from the nuclear deal. According to President Obama, the deal succeeded in completely cutting off all four pathways to producing a bomb, ensuring that Iran never acquires a nuclear weapon. Such sweeping statements simply cannot be guaranteed by the deal as concluded and are dangerously misleading. It is no cause for celebration to temporarily keep Iran "half nuclear." The immediacy of the Iranian nuclear threat has receded, but the threat of a nuclear Iran has not been eliminated. The writer is director of the Arms Control and Regional Security Program at the Institute for National Security Studies in Tel Aviv. 2016-06-23 00:00:00Full Article
The Iran Nuclear Deal: One Year On
(Jerusalem Report) Emily B. Landau - When assessing the Iran nuclear deal that was signed almost a year ago, especially against the backdrop of Iran's defiant behavior and aggressive conduct in the Middle East since then, one can hardly be complacent about what was achieved. The partial constraints imposed on Iran's nuclear program do not reflect what the world powers set out to do; nor do they warrant surrendering the leverage over Iran afforded by the sanctions regime. Iran's behavior over the past year makes it clear that rather than embracing a more cooperative approach toward the international community, Iran is persisting with its abusive rhetoric and aggressive policies, including stepping up its presence in Syria and intensifying its ballistic missile activities. Indeed, Iran has been testing the resolve of the U.S. to confront it, equipped with a new and quite effective deterrent to any determined Western response: its threat to walk away from the nuclear deal. According to President Obama, the deal succeeded in completely cutting off all four pathways to producing a bomb, ensuring that Iran never acquires a nuclear weapon. Such sweeping statements simply cannot be guaranteed by the deal as concluded and are dangerously misleading. It is no cause for celebration to temporarily keep Iran "half nuclear." The immediacy of the Iranian nuclear threat has receded, but the threat of a nuclear Iran has not been eliminated. The writer is director of the Arms Control and Regional Security Program at the Institute for National Security Studies in Tel Aviv. 2016-06-23 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|