Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(New Statesman-UK) Shiraz Maher - Ever since the latest offensive against IS began in Syria and Iraq in May, it has become clear that the group will not concede territory easily around Raqqa - the nerve center of IS operations in Syria - or elsewhere. All of its major urban centers remain well-fortified. Few observers expect them to fall any day soon. IS has too much invested in Raqqa, as well as Mosul in Iraq. Occupying the cities fuels the group's prestige by projecting the impression of viable statehood. IS has long anticipated a campaign against its Syrian base and has fortified Raqqa with trenches and landmines. What makes the fight against IS even more challenging is that its fighters are not easily disheartened. They are resolved to fight until victory or martyrdom - and for them both outcomes represent success. Islamic State has repeatedly invoked the vulnerability of the Sunnis to justify its violence. Videos released on social media from the latest assault on Fallujah appear to show how incoming Shia fighters have beaten and tortured Sunni civilians. The rapid deterioration in sectarian relations that followed the 2003 invasion of Iraq explains how IS was able to capture Sunni areas of Iraq with such ease. Ordinary residents do not necessarily agree with the authoritarian strictures of the IS regime, but they mostly understand them. These latest outrages from incoming Shia-dominated al-Hashd al-Shaabi fighters will only fuel the belief among Sunnis that they are best served by Sunni administrations - however brutal. That is the story behind so much of IS' strength today. Remove that constituency, and the group would collapse. The writer is deputy director of the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation at King's College London.2016-06-24 00:00:00Full Article
Why the Western-Backed Assault on Islamic State in Iraq and Syria Is Failing
(New Statesman-UK) Shiraz Maher - Ever since the latest offensive against IS began in Syria and Iraq in May, it has become clear that the group will not concede territory easily around Raqqa - the nerve center of IS operations in Syria - or elsewhere. All of its major urban centers remain well-fortified. Few observers expect them to fall any day soon. IS has too much invested in Raqqa, as well as Mosul in Iraq. Occupying the cities fuels the group's prestige by projecting the impression of viable statehood. IS has long anticipated a campaign against its Syrian base and has fortified Raqqa with trenches and landmines. What makes the fight against IS even more challenging is that its fighters are not easily disheartened. They are resolved to fight until victory or martyrdom - and for them both outcomes represent success. Islamic State has repeatedly invoked the vulnerability of the Sunnis to justify its violence. Videos released on social media from the latest assault on Fallujah appear to show how incoming Shia fighters have beaten and tortured Sunni civilians. The rapid deterioration in sectarian relations that followed the 2003 invasion of Iraq explains how IS was able to capture Sunni areas of Iraq with such ease. Ordinary residents do not necessarily agree with the authoritarian strictures of the IS regime, but they mostly understand them. These latest outrages from incoming Shia-dominated al-Hashd al-Shaabi fighters will only fuel the belief among Sunnis that they are best served by Sunni administrations - however brutal. That is the story behind so much of IS' strength today. Remove that constituency, and the group would collapse. The writer is deputy director of the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation at King's College London.2016-06-24 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|