Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Washington Institute for Near East Policy) James F. Jeffrey - The reverberations of the Iran deal (JCPOA) continue to echo throughout a Middle East that is arguably less secure than it was last July, in part because of the agreement. The region perceives that its political effects have encouraged, even enabled, Iran's hegemonic quest, and there is enough truth in this view that the burden is on Washington to show it is not the case. It is the wind in Iran's sails conjured by the deal, rather than any JCPOA specifics, that so concern most regional states. The deal has given Iran the means to expand its regional heft through diplomacy, money, surrogates, and violence by allowing the regime to profit from the release of many tens of billions of dollars of previously blocked oil earnings and renewed oil exports, to leave the negotiating table flush with arguable "victories" (i.e., maintaining the right to enrich uranium and avoiding a confession about its weaponization program), and to become newly attractive as a global trading partner. The Obama administration has become so indebted to Iran for the agreement that it has avoided challenging Iran and, worse, seems to view the agreement as a transformative moment with Tehran. For Ankara, Jerusalem, and most Arab states, Iran appears on the march in multiple theaters, without major U.S. pushback. The writer served as U.S. Deputy National Security Advisor and as Ambassador to Iraq and Turkey.2016-07-06 00:00:00Full Article
One Year after the Iran Deal: Sinking Confidence in the U.S. Balancing Role
(Washington Institute for Near East Policy) James F. Jeffrey - The reverberations of the Iran deal (JCPOA) continue to echo throughout a Middle East that is arguably less secure than it was last July, in part because of the agreement. The region perceives that its political effects have encouraged, even enabled, Iran's hegemonic quest, and there is enough truth in this view that the burden is on Washington to show it is not the case. It is the wind in Iran's sails conjured by the deal, rather than any JCPOA specifics, that so concern most regional states. The deal has given Iran the means to expand its regional heft through diplomacy, money, surrogates, and violence by allowing the regime to profit from the release of many tens of billions of dollars of previously blocked oil earnings and renewed oil exports, to leave the negotiating table flush with arguable "victories" (i.e., maintaining the right to enrich uranium and avoiding a confession about its weaponization program), and to become newly attractive as a global trading partner. The Obama administration has become so indebted to Iran for the agreement that it has avoided challenging Iran and, worse, seems to view the agreement as a transformative moment with Tehran. For Ankara, Jerusalem, and most Arab states, Iran appears on the march in multiple theaters, without major U.S. pushback. The writer served as U.S. Deputy National Security Advisor and as Ambassador to Iraq and Turkey.2016-07-06 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|