Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(New English Review) A.J. Caschetta - The term "lone wolf" to denote perpetrators of particularly heinous crimes who act without the assistance of others is illogical and misleading when used to describe jihadists. A jihadist may attack solo but he is always supported by a community that believes he is partaking honorably and piously in a 1400-year-old tradition. The battle cry "Allahu Akbar" is a sign of that community; those who shout it during an attack are not "lone wolves." Often, those quickly dubbed "lone wolves" during or shortly after their attacks are proven to be affiliated with terrorist groups. Even when law enforcement cannot prove membership or even physical contact between jihadists and terrorist organizations, there is often a great deal of evidence to show virtual contact. Ultimately the "lone wolf" analysis provides a useful tool for anyone seeking to disconnect Islam from jihad attacks. But by refusing to look for jihadists, and then after their attacks looking for reasons other than jihad, we make it easier for them to hide. The writer is a fellow at the Middle East Forum and a senior lecturer at the Rochester Institute of Technology. 2016-08-04 00:00:00Full Article
Flaws in the "Lone Wolf" Analysis
(New English Review) A.J. Caschetta - The term "lone wolf" to denote perpetrators of particularly heinous crimes who act without the assistance of others is illogical and misleading when used to describe jihadists. A jihadist may attack solo but he is always supported by a community that believes he is partaking honorably and piously in a 1400-year-old tradition. The battle cry "Allahu Akbar" is a sign of that community; those who shout it during an attack are not "lone wolves." Often, those quickly dubbed "lone wolves" during or shortly after their attacks are proven to be affiliated with terrorist groups. Even when law enforcement cannot prove membership or even physical contact between jihadists and terrorist organizations, there is often a great deal of evidence to show virtual contact. Ultimately the "lone wolf" analysis provides a useful tool for anyone seeking to disconnect Islam from jihad attacks. But by refusing to look for jihadists, and then after their attacks looking for reasons other than jihad, we make it easier for them to hide. The writer is a fellow at the Middle East Forum and a senior lecturer at the Rochester Institute of Technology. 2016-08-04 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|