Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Institute for Contemporary Affairs-Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs) Alan Baker - Israel is inundated with one-sided international resolutions, declarations, and "peace plans," most of which rest on widely-held, false, and mistaken assumptions regarding Israel, its leaders, government, policies, and positions held by the vast majority of the Israeli public. Israel entered the territories in 1967 after being attacked by all its neighbors, acting in self-defense against an offensive and aggressive war. The territory was never under Palestinian rule or sovereignty, and when it was under Jordanian control there was no intention by Jordan to turn it into a Palestinian state. Israel entertains valid, widely acknowledged and long-held historic and legal claims regarding the territories. Israel's settlements cannot be seen to be a violation of international law. Any determination of such is based on a selective, politically-biased viewpoint taken outside of accepted international practice. Pending attainment of a negotiated settlement, the Oslo Accords place no freeze or restriction on either Israel or the Palestinians to engage in planning, zoning, and construction in the respective areas under its control. To the contrary, planning, zoning and construction are specifically permitted. The claim that the settlements are the source of the conflict holds no logic. The Arab-Israel conflict existed long before the establishment of any settlement, with efforts by the Arab states in 1948 to prevent the establishment of the State of Israel and their ongoing efforts since then to bring about its demise. The Palestinian leadership refuses to resume negotiations, and refuses to meet or to enter into any dialogue with Israel's leaders. It blocks contacts between Palestinians and Israelis at the diplomatic, professional, and people-to-people levels. This policy runs counter to Palestinian commitments in the Oslo Accords to encourage development cooperation and "people-to-people dialogues" at all levels. While Israel has expressed its willingness for the principle of "two states for two peoples," the Palestinian leadership consistently refuses to accept the concept of Israel as the democratic nation state of the Jewish People. The present political stalemate between the Palestinians and Israel is not the result of Israeli defiance. Israel has repeatedly expressed its willingness to resume the negotiation process immediately. Amb. Alan Baker participated in the negotiation and drafting of the Oslo Accords with the Palestinians and served as legal adviser and deputy director-general of Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2016-08-16 00:00:00Full Article
Ten False Assumptions Regarding Israel
(Institute for Contemporary Affairs-Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs) Alan Baker - Israel is inundated with one-sided international resolutions, declarations, and "peace plans," most of which rest on widely-held, false, and mistaken assumptions regarding Israel, its leaders, government, policies, and positions held by the vast majority of the Israeli public. Israel entered the territories in 1967 after being attacked by all its neighbors, acting in self-defense against an offensive and aggressive war. The territory was never under Palestinian rule or sovereignty, and when it was under Jordanian control there was no intention by Jordan to turn it into a Palestinian state. Israel entertains valid, widely acknowledged and long-held historic and legal claims regarding the territories. Israel's settlements cannot be seen to be a violation of international law. Any determination of such is based on a selective, politically-biased viewpoint taken outside of accepted international practice. Pending attainment of a negotiated settlement, the Oslo Accords place no freeze or restriction on either Israel or the Palestinians to engage in planning, zoning, and construction in the respective areas under its control. To the contrary, planning, zoning and construction are specifically permitted. The claim that the settlements are the source of the conflict holds no logic. The Arab-Israel conflict existed long before the establishment of any settlement, with efforts by the Arab states in 1948 to prevent the establishment of the State of Israel and their ongoing efforts since then to bring about its demise. The Palestinian leadership refuses to resume negotiations, and refuses to meet or to enter into any dialogue with Israel's leaders. It blocks contacts between Palestinians and Israelis at the diplomatic, professional, and people-to-people levels. This policy runs counter to Palestinian commitments in the Oslo Accords to encourage development cooperation and "people-to-people dialogues" at all levels. While Israel has expressed its willingness for the principle of "two states for two peoples," the Palestinian leadership consistently refuses to accept the concept of Israel as the democratic nation state of the Jewish People. The present political stalemate between the Palestinians and Israel is not the result of Israeli defiance. Israel has repeatedly expressed its willingness to resume the negotiation process immediately. Amb. Alan Baker participated in the negotiation and drafting of the Oslo Accords with the Palestinians and served as legal adviser and deputy director-general of Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2016-08-16 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|