Home
Archives
Jerusalem Center Homepage
View the current issue
Jerusalem Center Videos
Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Ozy) John McLaughlin - A combination of fractious internal politics and Mideast regional trends may now have moved the Israeli-Palestinian problem into the category of "too hard." The regional context is entirely different than in 1993, when President Clinton presided over the signing of the Oslo Accord. Back then, Arab disputes with Israel were seen as the single most important roadblock to stability and peace in the Middle East. Now they are overshadowed by the larger drama of war in Syria and Iraq, the regionwide tensions between Sunni and Shia and the general chaos that followed the 2011 Arab Spring. The next U.S. president will have to weigh any effort to seek a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian problem against a much broader array of competing demands in the Middle East, so the likelihood is that this will not be as high on the U.S. priority list as in the past. The writer, deputy director and acting director of the CIA from 2000 to 2004, teaches at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies.2016-08-30 00:00:00Full Article
What Ever Happened to the Two-State Solution?
(Ozy) John McLaughlin - A combination of fractious internal politics and Mideast regional trends may now have moved the Israeli-Palestinian problem into the category of "too hard." The regional context is entirely different than in 1993, when President Clinton presided over the signing of the Oslo Accord. Back then, Arab disputes with Israel were seen as the single most important roadblock to stability and peace in the Middle East. Now they are overshadowed by the larger drama of war in Syria and Iraq, the regionwide tensions between Sunni and Shia and the general chaos that followed the 2011 Arab Spring. The next U.S. president will have to weigh any effort to seek a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian problem against a much broader array of competing demands in the Middle East, so the likelihood is that this will not be as high on the U.S. priority list as in the past. The writer, deputy director and acting director of the CIA from 2000 to 2004, teaches at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies.2016-08-30 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
|
Search:
|