Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(JTA) Cnaan Liphshiz - If the latest draft resolution at UNESCO on "Occupied Palestine" succeeded in reclaiming the world's attention, then it was a Pyrrhic victory. The resolution's erasure of Jewish ties to Jerusalem ignited a diplomatic dispute that is dividing UNESCO, embarrassing some of its member states and exposing the Palestinians to rebuke not only by Israel, but even by passionate supporters of their cause who are angered by what they perceive as an anti-Jewish bid to rewrite history. UNESCO director-general Irina Bokova of Bulgaria penned an unprecedented rebuke of the draft resolution passed by her own organization. "To deny, conceal or erase any of the Jewish, Christian or Muslim traditions undermines the integrity of the site, and runs counter to the reasons that justified its inscription on the UNESCO World Heritage list." Even Americans for Peace Now criticized the UNESCO resolution's "exclusionary and inflammatory language." Daniel Schwammenthal of the American Jewish Committee's Transatlantic Institute called the rebuke of the Palestinian gambit an expression of growing resentment internationally of Palestinian attempts after 2011 - the year Palestine was accepted into UNESCO - to "abuse, hijack or disrupt the work of international forums that have nothing to do with their conflict with Israel." Ultimately, "it wasn't Israel that got a black eye at the UNESCO vote but the United Nations, whose reputation was once again stained; the countries that supported an outrageous lie; and primarily the Palestinians, who are using up international support to deepen the distrust of the only people who can give them a state, the Israelis." 2016-10-26 00:00:00Full Article
With UNESCO Vote, Palestinians' Bid for Attention Backfires
(JTA) Cnaan Liphshiz - If the latest draft resolution at UNESCO on "Occupied Palestine" succeeded in reclaiming the world's attention, then it was a Pyrrhic victory. The resolution's erasure of Jewish ties to Jerusalem ignited a diplomatic dispute that is dividing UNESCO, embarrassing some of its member states and exposing the Palestinians to rebuke not only by Israel, but even by passionate supporters of their cause who are angered by what they perceive as an anti-Jewish bid to rewrite history. UNESCO director-general Irina Bokova of Bulgaria penned an unprecedented rebuke of the draft resolution passed by her own organization. "To deny, conceal or erase any of the Jewish, Christian or Muslim traditions undermines the integrity of the site, and runs counter to the reasons that justified its inscription on the UNESCO World Heritage list." Even Americans for Peace Now criticized the UNESCO resolution's "exclusionary and inflammatory language." Daniel Schwammenthal of the American Jewish Committee's Transatlantic Institute called the rebuke of the Palestinian gambit an expression of growing resentment internationally of Palestinian attempts after 2011 - the year Palestine was accepted into UNESCO - to "abuse, hijack or disrupt the work of international forums that have nothing to do with their conflict with Israel." Ultimately, "it wasn't Israel that got a black eye at the UNESCO vote but the United Nations, whose reputation was once again stained; the countries that supported an outrageous lie; and primarily the Palestinians, who are using up international support to deepen the distrust of the only people who can give them a state, the Israelis." 2016-10-26 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|