Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Washington Post) Carol Morello - The future of the nuclear agreement with Iran is in the air with the prospect that a Donald Trump administration could take steps that would cause Iran to abandon its commitments, experts said Wednesday. "I think it's basically the end game for the deal," said Richard Nephew, a Columbia University fellow who was the lead sanctions expert on the U.S. negotiating team. "It's very hard for me to see, based on the rhetoric, letting it stand as is, or not doing something that forces the Iranians to walk away." Uncertainty in Tehran is not necessarily a bad thing, said Mark Dubowitz, head of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, who opposed the deal. "I could see a Trump administration beginning to threaten the use of American power, and put the Iranians to a choice between severe sanctions and potential military action, or going back to renegotiate some key elements of the deal," he said, citing sunset provisions that lift some limitations after seven to 15 years. "One should never underestimate the power of U.S. secondary sanctions and the fear that creates in the marketplace - a fear that has now been intensified as a result of a President Trump." 2016-11-10 00:00:00Full Article
Trump Election May Impact on Iran Nuclear Deal
(Washington Post) Carol Morello - The future of the nuclear agreement with Iran is in the air with the prospect that a Donald Trump administration could take steps that would cause Iran to abandon its commitments, experts said Wednesday. "I think it's basically the end game for the deal," said Richard Nephew, a Columbia University fellow who was the lead sanctions expert on the U.S. negotiating team. "It's very hard for me to see, based on the rhetoric, letting it stand as is, or not doing something that forces the Iranians to walk away." Uncertainty in Tehran is not necessarily a bad thing, said Mark Dubowitz, head of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, who opposed the deal. "I could see a Trump administration beginning to threaten the use of American power, and put the Iranians to a choice between severe sanctions and potential military action, or going back to renegotiate some key elements of the deal," he said, citing sunset provisions that lift some limitations after seven to 15 years. "One should never underestimate the power of U.S. secondary sanctions and the fear that creates in the marketplace - a fear that has now been intensified as a result of a President Trump." 2016-11-10 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|