Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Telegraph-UK] Editorial - Although Israel has disavowed reports that it is planning a direct strike against Iran's nuclear facilities, there can be little doubt that Tel Aviv would authorize such attacks if the only other option were a nuclear Iran. From an Israeli point of view, the ayatollahs are not a putative threat but a proven aggressor. They have armed terrorist proxies in the Balkans, the Caucasus, Iraq, Lebanon, and even Argentina, where a bombing at a Jewish community center in 1994 killed 100 people. Iran's Shahab-3 missile has a range of 1,500 miles, but why worry about delivery mechanisms when you have paramilitaries? We have seen Teheran's readiness to equip Hizbullah with rockets. Can we be confident that they would not, if they could, tip these devices with nuclear warheads? It is now too late to prevent Iran from acquiring the know-how and materials it needs. Ten years were wasted in futile discussions with the EU, which believed that it could talk the mullahs out of their nuclear ambitions. In between the present policy of passing milk-and-water UN resolutions and the nuclear option is an escalating scale of pressure: targeted sanctions, asset seizures, and the kind of armed siege that paralyzed Saddam during the 1990s. Above all, we should be sponsoring Iranian dissidents: students, secularists, monarchists, non-Persians. It is time to replace the mullahs with a regime that is capable of dealing with other states on the basis of territorial jurisdiction, human rights, and international law. 2007-01-08 01:00:00Full Article
Time to Replace the Mullahs
[Telegraph-UK] Editorial - Although Israel has disavowed reports that it is planning a direct strike against Iran's nuclear facilities, there can be little doubt that Tel Aviv would authorize such attacks if the only other option were a nuclear Iran. From an Israeli point of view, the ayatollahs are not a putative threat but a proven aggressor. They have armed terrorist proxies in the Balkans, the Caucasus, Iraq, Lebanon, and even Argentina, where a bombing at a Jewish community center in 1994 killed 100 people. Iran's Shahab-3 missile has a range of 1,500 miles, but why worry about delivery mechanisms when you have paramilitaries? We have seen Teheran's readiness to equip Hizbullah with rockets. Can we be confident that they would not, if they could, tip these devices with nuclear warheads? It is now too late to prevent Iran from acquiring the know-how and materials it needs. Ten years were wasted in futile discussions with the EU, which believed that it could talk the mullahs out of their nuclear ambitions. In between the present policy of passing milk-and-water UN resolutions and the nuclear option is an escalating scale of pressure: targeted sanctions, asset seizures, and the kind of armed siege that paralyzed Saddam during the 1990s. Above all, we should be sponsoring Iranian dissidents: students, secularists, monarchists, non-Persians. It is time to replace the mullahs with a regime that is capable of dealing with other states on the basis of territorial jurisdiction, human rights, and international law. 2007-01-08 01:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|