Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs) Brig.-Gen. (res.) Yossi Kuperwasser - President-elect Donald Trump has three options for dealing with the Iran nuclear agreement. 1) Not to touch the agreement, but to intensify efforts to verify that Iran is upholding it. Supporters of this approach include those who maintain that enhanced supervision would probably expose Iranian breaches of the agreement. 2) Not to touch the agreement, but to add sanctions on non-nuclear issues such as Iran's efforts to develop long-range missiles, its support for terror, and human rights violations. The chances would increase that the Iranians would react angrily and indeed violate the nuclear agreement, enabling the U.S., in turn, to renounce it without bearing the responsibility for its collapse. 3) To demand of Iran that the agreement be reopened for discussion. Legally there is no problem here because the U.S. commitment to the JCPOA was based on a presidential decree. From the U.S. standpoint, the plan did not become an international treaty (indeed, none of the sides signed it). The writer, Director of the Project on Regional Middle East Developments at the Jerusalem Center, was formerly head of the Research Division of IDF Military Intelligence. 2016-12-13 00:00:00Full Article
Trump's Big Decision on Iran
(Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs) Brig.-Gen. (res.) Yossi Kuperwasser - President-elect Donald Trump has three options for dealing with the Iran nuclear agreement. 1) Not to touch the agreement, but to intensify efforts to verify that Iran is upholding it. Supporters of this approach include those who maintain that enhanced supervision would probably expose Iranian breaches of the agreement. 2) Not to touch the agreement, but to add sanctions on non-nuclear issues such as Iran's efforts to develop long-range missiles, its support for terror, and human rights violations. The chances would increase that the Iranians would react angrily and indeed violate the nuclear agreement, enabling the U.S., in turn, to renounce it without bearing the responsibility for its collapse. 3) To demand of Iran that the agreement be reopened for discussion. Legally there is no problem here because the U.S. commitment to the JCPOA was based on a presidential decree. From the U.S. standpoint, the plan did not become an international treaty (indeed, none of the sides signed it). The writer, Director of the Project on Regional Middle East Developments at the Jerusalem Center, was formerly head of the Research Division of IDF Military Intelligence. 2016-12-13 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|