Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies-Bar-Ilan University) Col. (res.) Dr. Eran Lerman - The Palestinian leadership may yet rue the day they managed to secure an American abstention leading to the adoption of UN Security Council Resolution 2334. This poorly designed and atrociously timed diplomatic tool seems set to harm, if not entirely destroy, the very purposes it was designed to serve. It is bound to do damage to Israeli interests (and those of Palestinian employees in Jewish-owned businesses) by giving momentum to the BDS movement. Moreover, when Israeli leaders are confronted with a UN and U.S. endorsement of the Arab narrative, they are unlikely to feel comfortable enough to work for an equitable compromise, and certainly not when there is no partner for compromise on the other side. The so-called "Occupied Palestinian Territories" were never Palestinian at any point: first, the Palestinian leadership rejected UN General Assembly Resolution 181 of November 1947 and launched a war of annihilation against Israel; and second, the territories were held between 1949 and 1967 by an occupying power that gained the recognition of only two states (Britain and Pakistan) to their annexation to Jordan. Thus, Israel is the only existing inheritor of the League of Nations mandate, which called for the "close settlement of Jews on the land." A second unfortunate aspect is that the Obama administration, secure in the presumption that it was "saving Israel from itself," drew no lessons from its own past errors of judgment. Obama's efforts to create "daylight" between U.S. and Israeli positions led to the one of the longest barren periods in the history of the peace process. Now the mistake has been repeated and worsened. A "solution" that encourages the Palestinians to believe in the forced removal of hundreds of thousands of Jews living beyond the 1949 armistice lines, including in east Jerusalem, is a pipe dream. The writer is former deputy for foreign policy and international affairs at Israel's National Security Council.2016-12-28 00:00:00Full Article
UN Security Council Resolution 2334: A Disservice to the Cause of Peace
(Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies-Bar-Ilan University) Col. (res.) Dr. Eran Lerman - The Palestinian leadership may yet rue the day they managed to secure an American abstention leading to the adoption of UN Security Council Resolution 2334. This poorly designed and atrociously timed diplomatic tool seems set to harm, if not entirely destroy, the very purposes it was designed to serve. It is bound to do damage to Israeli interests (and those of Palestinian employees in Jewish-owned businesses) by giving momentum to the BDS movement. Moreover, when Israeli leaders are confronted with a UN and U.S. endorsement of the Arab narrative, they are unlikely to feel comfortable enough to work for an equitable compromise, and certainly not when there is no partner for compromise on the other side. The so-called "Occupied Palestinian Territories" were never Palestinian at any point: first, the Palestinian leadership rejected UN General Assembly Resolution 181 of November 1947 and launched a war of annihilation against Israel; and second, the territories were held between 1949 and 1967 by an occupying power that gained the recognition of only two states (Britain and Pakistan) to their annexation to Jordan. Thus, Israel is the only existing inheritor of the League of Nations mandate, which called for the "close settlement of Jews on the land." A second unfortunate aspect is that the Obama administration, secure in the presumption that it was "saving Israel from itself," drew no lessons from its own past errors of judgment. Obama's efforts to create "daylight" between U.S. and Israeli positions led to the one of the longest barren periods in the history of the peace process. Now the mistake has been repeated and worsened. A "solution" that encourages the Palestinians to believe in the forced removal of hundreds of thousands of Jews living beyond the 1949 armistice lines, including in east Jerusalem, is a pipe dream. The writer is former deputy for foreign policy and international affairs at Israel's National Security Council.2016-12-28 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|