Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Council on Foreign Relations) Steven A. Cook - The Palestinian Authority cannot claim to want two states living side-by-side while it routinely delegitimizes Israel and the Jewish connection to the land. The PA's president, Mahmoud Abbas, and Fatah cannot claim to want to settle the conflict when, at the same time, they glorify, in Arabic, violence against Israelis and Jews. The people who run Gaza - Hamas - are more up front about their goals to liberate all of Palestine, meaning all of the territory that is Israel. What was so interesting about Secretary of State Kerry's speech was that he billed it as a last-ditch effort to save the two-state solution, but he actually outlined precisely why such an outcome is entirely unlikely. Kerry might have gotten more credit had he framed the speech as a statement about the fallacy of two democratic states living side-by-side in peace and offered some thoughts about how best to manage the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians going forward because a one-state solution is not going to happen either. The secretary also made clear the limits of American power when parties to a conflict define their struggle in existential terms. This is worth underlining, given the American inclination to believe that, with enough grit and determination, the U.S. can meaningfully contribute to the resolution of these kinds of conflicts. This should also shatter any Arab illusions about Washington's ability to force a solution on the parties. The writer is a senior fellow for Middle East and Africa studies at CFR.2016-12-30 00:00:00Full Article
The Misplaced Optimism of the Two-State Solution
(Council on Foreign Relations) Steven A. Cook - The Palestinian Authority cannot claim to want two states living side-by-side while it routinely delegitimizes Israel and the Jewish connection to the land. The PA's president, Mahmoud Abbas, and Fatah cannot claim to want to settle the conflict when, at the same time, they glorify, in Arabic, violence against Israelis and Jews. The people who run Gaza - Hamas - are more up front about their goals to liberate all of Palestine, meaning all of the territory that is Israel. What was so interesting about Secretary of State Kerry's speech was that he billed it as a last-ditch effort to save the two-state solution, but he actually outlined precisely why such an outcome is entirely unlikely. Kerry might have gotten more credit had he framed the speech as a statement about the fallacy of two democratic states living side-by-side in peace and offered some thoughts about how best to manage the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians going forward because a one-state solution is not going to happen either. The secretary also made clear the limits of American power when parties to a conflict define their struggle in existential terms. This is worth underlining, given the American inclination to believe that, with enough grit and determination, the U.S. can meaningfully contribute to the resolution of these kinds of conflicts. This should also shatter any Arab illusions about Washington's ability to force a solution on the parties. The writer is a senior fellow for Middle East and Africa studies at CFR.2016-12-30 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|