Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Wall Street Journal) Michael Makovsky - There is an urgent need to restore U.S. credibility and resolve in opposing Iranian aggression. The U.S. will need years to rebuild a robust international sanctions regime, and sanctions without military credibility cannot stop Iran from flouting the nuclear deal or inflaming the region. A proven necessary ingredient in dealing with Iran is a credible military threat. Two examples: Tehran suspended elements of its nuclear program in 2003-04 following the U.S. overthrow of Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, and it never crossed Israel's 2012 red line over its nuclear stockpile. The new administration should instruct the Pentagon to update contingency plans for the use of force against Iran, including its nuclear facilities, especially in the event of a significant violation of, or withdrawal from, the nuclear agreement. This will communicate a new robust posture and prepare for what might be necessary. It should boost the anti-Iran regional coalition instead of alienating traditional regional allies. This includes supporting the Saudi-led coalition fighting the Iranian-backed Houthi insurgency in Yemen, increasing aid for Jordan, supporting Egyptian President Sisi, and improving relations with Azerbaijan. It also includes bolstering support for Israel, backing it strongly against Iran-supported Hamas and Hizbullah, and mitigating negative consequences of the recent UN Security Council resolution, including by moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem. The writer, a Pentagon official in the George W. Bush administration, is president and CEO of the Jewish Institute for National Security of America (JINSA).2017-01-04 00:00:00Full Article
Ways for the New Administration to Put Tehran on Notice
(Wall Street Journal) Michael Makovsky - There is an urgent need to restore U.S. credibility and resolve in opposing Iranian aggression. The U.S. will need years to rebuild a robust international sanctions regime, and sanctions without military credibility cannot stop Iran from flouting the nuclear deal or inflaming the region. A proven necessary ingredient in dealing with Iran is a credible military threat. Two examples: Tehran suspended elements of its nuclear program in 2003-04 following the U.S. overthrow of Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, and it never crossed Israel's 2012 red line over its nuclear stockpile. The new administration should instruct the Pentagon to update contingency plans for the use of force against Iran, including its nuclear facilities, especially in the event of a significant violation of, or withdrawal from, the nuclear agreement. This will communicate a new robust posture and prepare for what might be necessary. It should boost the anti-Iran regional coalition instead of alienating traditional regional allies. This includes supporting the Saudi-led coalition fighting the Iranian-backed Houthi insurgency in Yemen, increasing aid for Jordan, supporting Egyptian President Sisi, and improving relations with Azerbaijan. It also includes bolstering support for Israel, backing it strongly against Iran-supported Hamas and Hizbullah, and mitigating negative consequences of the recent UN Security Council resolution, including by moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem. The writer, a Pentagon official in the George W. Bush administration, is president and CEO of the Jewish Institute for National Security of America (JINSA).2017-01-04 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|