Home
Archives
Jerusalem Center Homepage
View the current issue
Jerusalem Center Videos
Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(House Foreign Affairs Committee) Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce (R-CA) - Ranking Member Eliot Engel (D-NY) and I engaged in letters and conversations with senior Administration officials, seeking their assurance that the United States would veto one-sided, anti-Israel resolutions. And in November, the House unanimously passed a resolution which warned the Administration against taking such last-minute action. That resolution - H.Con.Res. 165 - stated that "the United States Government should continue to oppose and veto United Nations Security Council resolutions that seek to impose solutions to final status issues, or are one-sided and anti-Israel." Yet, the Administration rejected the call from Congress, and chose a course that will bring harm for years to come by failing to veto UN Security Council Resolution 2334. If the Palestinians want a lasting peace, they must accept that Israel, not the UN, is their negotiating partner. It also means ending their "pay-to-slay" scheme. Since 2003, it has been Palestinian law to reward Palestinian terrorists in Israeli jails with a monthly paycheck. That amounts to $300 million per year, by one estimate. 2017-01-06 00:00:00Full Article
House Stands with Ally Israel
(House Foreign Affairs Committee) Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce (R-CA) - Ranking Member Eliot Engel (D-NY) and I engaged in letters and conversations with senior Administration officials, seeking their assurance that the United States would veto one-sided, anti-Israel resolutions. And in November, the House unanimously passed a resolution which warned the Administration against taking such last-minute action. That resolution - H.Con.Res. 165 - stated that "the United States Government should continue to oppose and veto United Nations Security Council resolutions that seek to impose solutions to final status issues, or are one-sided and anti-Israel." Yet, the Administration rejected the call from Congress, and chose a course that will bring harm for years to come by failing to veto UN Security Council Resolution 2334. If the Palestinians want a lasting peace, they must accept that Israel, not the UN, is their negotiating partner. It also means ending their "pay-to-slay" scheme. Since 2003, it has been Palestinian law to reward Palestinian terrorists in Israeli jails with a monthly paycheck. That amounts to $300 million per year, by one estimate. 2017-01-06 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
|
Search:
|