Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) Yonah Jeremy Bob - It is important for the Trump administration to establish with Iran that "we are not going to play the same game that the Obama administration was. We see what you are doing. We don't accept it and we will respond. This is important for U.S. deterrence," Emily Landau, head of the Arms Control and Regional Security Program at the Institute for National Security Studies in Tel Aviv, said on Sunday. "There is a certain equation between the U.S. and Iran. If Iran provokes and the U.S. does not react, Iran's deterrent power goes up because it learns it can do these provocations with no consequences. U.S. power goes down because it is so afraid that it will let any provocation go by, even acting as Iran's advocate so that there is no problem with anything Iran does." Former Israeli national security adviser Maj.-Gen. (ret.) Yaakov Amidror noted, "This [U.S.] government is not afraid Iran will walk away from the [nuclear] deal, so it has more freedom...this advantage allows it to put pressure on Iran" and to respond to Iranian provocations. Amidror said the current government "thinks the deal is bad for the U.S....thinks it must contain Iran...does not worry about the outcome if the agreement ended and...would be happy" if it could blame Tehran for ending the deal. He added, "It is not connected to Israel. It is connected to an American understanding that these things are not good for the U.S." 2017-02-06 00:00:00Full Article
U.S. Policy Change Important to Deter Iran
(Jerusalem Post) Yonah Jeremy Bob - It is important for the Trump administration to establish with Iran that "we are not going to play the same game that the Obama administration was. We see what you are doing. We don't accept it and we will respond. This is important for U.S. deterrence," Emily Landau, head of the Arms Control and Regional Security Program at the Institute for National Security Studies in Tel Aviv, said on Sunday. "There is a certain equation between the U.S. and Iran. If Iran provokes and the U.S. does not react, Iran's deterrent power goes up because it learns it can do these provocations with no consequences. U.S. power goes down because it is so afraid that it will let any provocation go by, even acting as Iran's advocate so that there is no problem with anything Iran does." Former Israeli national security adviser Maj.-Gen. (ret.) Yaakov Amidror noted, "This [U.S.] government is not afraid Iran will walk away from the [nuclear] deal, so it has more freedom...this advantage allows it to put pressure on Iran" and to respond to Iranian provocations. Amidror said the current government "thinks the deal is bad for the U.S....thinks it must contain Iran...does not worry about the outcome if the agreement ended and...would be happy" if it could blame Tehran for ending the deal. He added, "It is not connected to Israel. It is connected to an American understanding that these things are not good for the U.S." 2017-02-06 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|