Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies-Bar-Ilan University) Uzi Rubin - On March 17, 2017, the Arrow missile defense system successfully intercepted a Syrian antiaircraft missile that had been fired against Israel Air Force aircraft engaged in a deep penetration mission inside Syria. The Arrow was originally optimized against medium- and long-range ballistic missiles, with the Arrow 2 for high atmosphere interceptions and Arrow 3 for space interceptions. The system was extensively tested but did not feature in any of the last decade's wars against short-range rockets from Lebanon and Gaza. The March 17 interception was thus its first-ever reported combat action. Even more impressive is the fact that the destroyed threat was not a ballistic missile but an antiaircraft missile. No missile defense system dedicated to the interception of antiaircraft missiles has yet been developed. That is because it is more feasible to neutralize them through "soft" defenses like electronic warfare and decoys. A previous firing of antiaircraft missiles against IAF planes took place in January 2017. In neither case was the Israeli plane hit, indicating that they carried sufficient "soft" defenses to thwart the Syrian missiles. On March 17, a Syrian SA-5 interceptor, dimensionally very similar to a Scud, missed its target, did not self-destruct, and continued to fly in a stable ballistic trajectory toward Israel. It was picked up at a distance by the "Green Pine" radars, its predicted impact point was seen to be within Israeli territory, and it was classified as an imminent threat. Using a single interceptor, the Arrow system detected, locked onto, and neutralized a threatening missile of a type never envisaged during its original design. The writer was founding director of the Israel Missile Defense Organization, which managed the Arrow program. 2017-04-03 00:00:00Full Article
Israel's Arrow Intercepts a Syrian Missile
(Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies-Bar-Ilan University) Uzi Rubin - On March 17, 2017, the Arrow missile defense system successfully intercepted a Syrian antiaircraft missile that had been fired against Israel Air Force aircraft engaged in a deep penetration mission inside Syria. The Arrow was originally optimized against medium- and long-range ballistic missiles, with the Arrow 2 for high atmosphere interceptions and Arrow 3 for space interceptions. The system was extensively tested but did not feature in any of the last decade's wars against short-range rockets from Lebanon and Gaza. The March 17 interception was thus its first-ever reported combat action. Even more impressive is the fact that the destroyed threat was not a ballistic missile but an antiaircraft missile. No missile defense system dedicated to the interception of antiaircraft missiles has yet been developed. That is because it is more feasible to neutralize them through "soft" defenses like electronic warfare and decoys. A previous firing of antiaircraft missiles against IAF planes took place in January 2017. In neither case was the Israeli plane hit, indicating that they carried sufficient "soft" defenses to thwart the Syrian missiles. On March 17, a Syrian SA-5 interceptor, dimensionally very similar to a Scud, missed its target, did not self-destruct, and continued to fly in a stable ballistic trajectory toward Israel. It was picked up at a distance by the "Green Pine" radars, its predicted impact point was seen to be within Israeli territory, and it was classified as an imminent threat. Using a single interceptor, the Arrow system detected, locked onto, and neutralized a threatening missile of a type never envisaged during its original design. The writer was founding director of the Israel Missile Defense Organization, which managed the Arrow program. 2017-04-03 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|