Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Washington Institute for Near East Policy) Michael Eisenstadt - Experience indicates that Assad will likely continue defying the international community and challenging the chemical weapons redline, and that additional strikes may be necessary to deter him from doing so. The U.S. should keep in mind that its best hope for an exit strategy that advances its interests in Syria is by fostering the creation of effective non-Salafist rebel forces that can draw Sunnis away from the extremists and apply sustained military pressure on the Assad regime. Only a military balance that produces a costly stalemate for the regime will generate the pressures needed to achieve a diplomatic solution to the war. It may be too late for such an effort to succeed, but that should not stop the U.S. from trying. The writer is director of the Military and Security Studies Program at The Washington Institute.2017-04-12 00:00:00Full Article
Military Strikes on Syria: Historical Lessons and Implications
(Washington Institute for Near East Policy) Michael Eisenstadt - Experience indicates that Assad will likely continue defying the international community and challenging the chemical weapons redline, and that additional strikes may be necessary to deter him from doing so. The U.S. should keep in mind that its best hope for an exit strategy that advances its interests in Syria is by fostering the creation of effective non-Salafist rebel forces that can draw Sunnis away from the extremists and apply sustained military pressure on the Assad regime. Only a military balance that produces a costly stalemate for the regime will generate the pressures needed to achieve a diplomatic solution to the war. It may be too late for such an effort to succeed, but that should not stop the U.S. from trying. The writer is director of the Military and Security Studies Program at The Washington Institute.2017-04-12 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|