Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Washington Post) Marc A. Thiessen - Trump did not reveal to anyone that Israel was the source of intelligence he shared with the Russians. So how did the New York Times, which broke the news of Israel's role, find out? According to the Times, its sources were "a current and a former American official." NBC News, meanwhile, reported that it had confirmed the Israeli role "with three government officials." Ponder the irony: These geniuses were so appalled by Trump sharing sensitive intelligence with the Russians that they shared even more sensitive intelligence with the media. In so doing, these leakers possibly did far more damage to U.S. national security - and intelligence-sharing between the U.S. and Israel - than anything Trump may have revealed to the Russians. That is the assessment of John Brennan, Barack Obama's CIA director, who said last week that "the real damage to national security is...what was leaked in the aftermath," adding that "these individuals who still stay within the government and are leaking this stuff to the press need to be brought to task." When the Obama administration exposed Israel's role in the "Stuxnet" cyberattack on Iran's nuclear program, a member of Obama's national security team intentionally exposed intelligence sources and methods to the New York Times. The damage this leak did - both to the operation and the trust between our two countries - was incalculable. Where was the deep concern for the exposure of this intelligence? These leakers are the ones who cannot be trusted with sensitive intelligence. The writer is a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. 2017-05-24 00:00:00Full Article
Leakers Who Revealed Israel as Intelligence Source Did Far More Damage than Trump
(Washington Post) Marc A. Thiessen - Trump did not reveal to anyone that Israel was the source of intelligence he shared with the Russians. So how did the New York Times, which broke the news of Israel's role, find out? According to the Times, its sources were "a current and a former American official." NBC News, meanwhile, reported that it had confirmed the Israeli role "with three government officials." Ponder the irony: These geniuses were so appalled by Trump sharing sensitive intelligence with the Russians that they shared even more sensitive intelligence with the media. In so doing, these leakers possibly did far more damage to U.S. national security - and intelligence-sharing between the U.S. and Israel - than anything Trump may have revealed to the Russians. That is the assessment of John Brennan, Barack Obama's CIA director, who said last week that "the real damage to national security is...what was leaked in the aftermath," adding that "these individuals who still stay within the government and are leaking this stuff to the press need to be brought to task." When the Obama administration exposed Israel's role in the "Stuxnet" cyberattack on Iran's nuclear program, a member of Obama's national security team intentionally exposed intelligence sources and methods to the New York Times. The damage this leak did - both to the operation and the trust between our two countries - was incalculable. Where was the deep concern for the exposure of this intelligence? These leakers are the ones who cannot be trusted with sensitive intelligence. The writer is a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. 2017-05-24 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|