Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Gatestone Institute) Alan M. Dershowitz - There is a widespread but false belief that Mahmoud Abbas is finally prepared to accept the two-state solution proposed by the UN in November 1947. The Arabs of Palestine rejected the division of mandatory Palestine and declared that they would never accept a state for the Jewish people along with statehood for the Palestinian people. They wanted for there not to be a state for the Jewish people more than for there to be a state for their own people. That is why Abbas refuses to say that he would ever accept the principle of two states for two peoples. I know because I have personally asked him on several occasions. The general idea of a two-state solution - which Abbas has nominally supported - does not specify that one state would be for the Jewish people and the other one for the Arabs. In a 2003 interview he said: "I've said it before, and I'll say it again: I will never recognize the Jewishness of the state, or a 'Jewish state.'" Abbas is, of course, committed to Palestine being a Muslim state under Sharia law. It is a tragedy that the international community encourages the Palestinian Authority's rejectionism, rather than pushing it to make the painful compromises that will be needed from both sides in reaching a negotiated two-state outcome. The writer is professor of law, emeritus, at Harvard Law School. 2017-06-14 00:00:00Full Article
Why Won't Abbas Accept "Two States for Two Peoples"?
(Gatestone Institute) Alan M. Dershowitz - There is a widespread but false belief that Mahmoud Abbas is finally prepared to accept the two-state solution proposed by the UN in November 1947. The Arabs of Palestine rejected the division of mandatory Palestine and declared that they would never accept a state for the Jewish people along with statehood for the Palestinian people. They wanted for there not to be a state for the Jewish people more than for there to be a state for their own people. That is why Abbas refuses to say that he would ever accept the principle of two states for two peoples. I know because I have personally asked him on several occasions. The general idea of a two-state solution - which Abbas has nominally supported - does not specify that one state would be for the Jewish people and the other one for the Arabs. In a 2003 interview he said: "I've said it before, and I'll say it again: I will never recognize the Jewishness of the state, or a 'Jewish state.'" Abbas is, of course, committed to Palestine being a Muslim state under Sharia law. It is a tragedy that the international community encourages the Palestinian Authority's rejectionism, rather than pushing it to make the painful compromises that will be needed from both sides in reaching a negotiated two-state outcome. The writer is professor of law, emeritus, at Harvard Law School. 2017-06-14 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|