Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Middle East Quarterly) Efraim Inbar - Israel's astounding military victory in June 1967 was a key factor in driving parts of the Arab world to confront the reality of Jewish statehood. Israel's victory transformed the international discourse about the country's future borders, with the June 1967 line becoming the starting point for any such discussion. This represented a sea change for Israel, whose neighbors had previously refused to accept its very existence. Control of the Golan Heights and the Jordan Valley gave Israel far better military lines of defense than it had before 1967. The IDF's presence on Mount Hermon enables the gathering of intelligence on goings-on in Syria. Without Israel's defense line on the Golan, the Syrians would have managed to invade its territory in the October 1973 war, with tragic consequences. Instead, the security margins provided by the Golan allowed the IDF to contain the Syrian offensive, regroup, and move onto the counterattack. Expectations that a newly-established Palestinian state in the West Bank will meet its contractual peace obligations and refrain from siding with Israel's enemies in future military confrontations, let alone refrain from wholesale anti-Israel terrorism, run counter to the Palestinian modus operandi during the past 24 years, as well as the relentless Palestinian commitment to Israel's destruction in flagrant violation of their contractual obligations in the Oslo accords. The Palestinians' unhappy situation is primarily self-inflicted. Rather than promote a real quest for independence and nation-building, Palestinian leaders, from the 1920s to the present day, have gone from one disaster to another while lining their pockets from the proceeds of this misery. While Israel can agree that the West Bank's densely populated areas (designated as areas A and B by the Oslo Accords), where most of the Palestinian population lives, could become an independent political entity or be annexed to Jordan as part of a bilateral peace agreement, maintaining military control over the area west of the Jordan River is essential for Israel's national security (and for Jordanian security for that matter). The writer is professor emeritus of political studies at Bar-Ilan University and founding director of its Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies. 2017-06-14 00:00:00Full Article
The Six-Day War: Costs vs. Benefits for Israel
(Middle East Quarterly) Efraim Inbar - Israel's astounding military victory in June 1967 was a key factor in driving parts of the Arab world to confront the reality of Jewish statehood. Israel's victory transformed the international discourse about the country's future borders, with the June 1967 line becoming the starting point for any such discussion. This represented a sea change for Israel, whose neighbors had previously refused to accept its very existence. Control of the Golan Heights and the Jordan Valley gave Israel far better military lines of defense than it had before 1967. The IDF's presence on Mount Hermon enables the gathering of intelligence on goings-on in Syria. Without Israel's defense line on the Golan, the Syrians would have managed to invade its territory in the October 1973 war, with tragic consequences. Instead, the security margins provided by the Golan allowed the IDF to contain the Syrian offensive, regroup, and move onto the counterattack. Expectations that a newly-established Palestinian state in the West Bank will meet its contractual peace obligations and refrain from siding with Israel's enemies in future military confrontations, let alone refrain from wholesale anti-Israel terrorism, run counter to the Palestinian modus operandi during the past 24 years, as well as the relentless Palestinian commitment to Israel's destruction in flagrant violation of their contractual obligations in the Oslo accords. The Palestinians' unhappy situation is primarily self-inflicted. Rather than promote a real quest for independence and nation-building, Palestinian leaders, from the 1920s to the present day, have gone from one disaster to another while lining their pockets from the proceeds of this misery. While Israel can agree that the West Bank's densely populated areas (designated as areas A and B by the Oslo Accords), where most of the Palestinian population lives, could become an independent political entity or be annexed to Jordan as part of a bilateral peace agreement, maintaining military control over the area west of the Jordan River is essential for Israel's national security (and for Jordanian security for that matter). The writer is professor emeritus of political studies at Bar-Ilan University and founding director of its Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies. 2017-06-14 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|