Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(National Post-Canada) Andrian Humphreys - Ontario's Court of Appeal upheld a US$1.7-billion judgment against the government of Iran in favor of American victims of terrorism, accusing Tehran of trying to derail Canada's Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act. "The terrorist attacks out of which the respondents' U.S. judgments arise are repugnant to civilized society. The fact that a foreign government would engage in the sponsorship of such atrocities is chilling," wrote Justice C. William Hourigan. "There is nothing offensive about using peaceful legislative means to combat terrorism. To the contrary, awarding damages that may have a deterrent effect is a sensible and measured response to the state sponsorship of terrorism and is entirely consistent with Canadian legal morals." Victims of terror attacks and their families had sued Iran in the U.S. for arming, training and bankrolling Hamas and Hizbullah. The terror victims won their cases, but with few Iranian government assets remaining in the U.S., the victims turned to Canada for restitution, where Tehran maintained property and bank accounts. Canada's Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act, enacted in 2012, allows U.S. victims to seek Iran's money in Canada. 2017-07-04 00:00:00Full Article
Ontario Court Upholds $1.7 Billion Judgment Against Iran, Ruling in Favor of American Victims of Terrorism
(National Post-Canada) Andrian Humphreys - Ontario's Court of Appeal upheld a US$1.7-billion judgment against the government of Iran in favor of American victims of terrorism, accusing Tehran of trying to derail Canada's Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act. "The terrorist attacks out of which the respondents' U.S. judgments arise are repugnant to civilized society. The fact that a foreign government would engage in the sponsorship of such atrocities is chilling," wrote Justice C. William Hourigan. "There is nothing offensive about using peaceful legislative means to combat terrorism. To the contrary, awarding damages that may have a deterrent effect is a sensible and measured response to the state sponsorship of terrorism and is entirely consistent with Canadian legal morals." Victims of terror attacks and their families had sued Iran in the U.S. for arming, training and bankrolling Hamas and Hizbullah. The terror victims won their cases, but with few Iranian government assets remaining in the U.S., the victims turned to Canada for restitution, where Tehran maintained property and bank accounts. Canada's Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act, enacted in 2012, allows U.S. victims to seek Iran's money in Canada. 2017-07-04 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|