Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Boston Globe] Joshua Gleis - Talks with Iran have reached another impasse as the Islamic regime rejected yet another package of incentives to end its nuclear enrichment program. One would think that the international community would be doing everything in its power to press Iran into accepting a compromise. Yet two countries - China and Russia - are not only undermining the effort, but are actually profiting from the rest of the world's sanctions. As European businesses pull their investments out of Iran, in line with current EU sanctions, the Chinese and Russians have been happily stepping in to fill those lucrative vacancies. In essence, they are reaping the benefits of other governments' efforts to stave off the disaster that a nuclear Iran would be. China and Russia may be enticed into supporting stronger sanctions against Iran if the U.S. and other parties in the negotiations can demonstrate the greater economic benefits available to them all once a deal with Tehran is reached. It is imperative that the Chinese and Russians understand they have much more to gain from an end to the conflict with Iran than they do from a complete meltdown. The writer is an international security associate at the Belfer Center at Harvard's Kennedy School and a visiting scholar at Columbia University. 2008-08-11 01:00:00Full Article
Chinese, Russian Stall Tactics on Iran
[Boston Globe] Joshua Gleis - Talks with Iran have reached another impasse as the Islamic regime rejected yet another package of incentives to end its nuclear enrichment program. One would think that the international community would be doing everything in its power to press Iran into accepting a compromise. Yet two countries - China and Russia - are not only undermining the effort, but are actually profiting from the rest of the world's sanctions. As European businesses pull their investments out of Iran, in line with current EU sanctions, the Chinese and Russians have been happily stepping in to fill those lucrative vacancies. In essence, they are reaping the benefits of other governments' efforts to stave off the disaster that a nuclear Iran would be. China and Russia may be enticed into supporting stronger sanctions against Iran if the U.S. and other parties in the negotiations can demonstrate the greater economic benefits available to them all once a deal with Tehran is reached. It is imperative that the Chinese and Russians understand they have much more to gain from an end to the conflict with Iran than they do from a complete meltdown. The writer is an international security associate at the Belfer Center at Harvard's Kennedy School and a visiting scholar at Columbia University. 2008-08-11 01:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|