Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Mosaic) Martin Kramer - Compared with the festivities surrounding the Balfour Declaration centenary, relatively little attention is being paid to the 70th anniversary of the UN partition vote. But there is a compelling reason to emphasize the 1947 resolution, and to do so time and again. That reason: the Arabs rejected it. And because they did, preferring war, they cannot escape their share of responsibility for the war's consequences: their nakba. Evasion of responsibility explains why the Palestinians, in telling the saga of their "dispossession," stress the Balfour Declaration and downplay the partition resolution. Prior to the 1947 vote, the UN General Assembly empowered UNSCOP, comprising representatives of 11 uninvolved member-states, to investigate the situation and make recommendations. This is now standard procedure in the handling of conflicts. But Palestinian Arab leaders at the time boycotted UNSCOP. In the Arab view, the Jews had no right to anything. They thought that once the British left, they would defeat the Jews. Why concede anything to a motley mob of cowardly Jews? It took more than 60 years for a Palestinian leader, Mahmoud Abbas, to describe Palestinian and Arab rejection of partition as a "mistake" (in an interview in 2011). It is important to mark this anniversary of the UN partition vote and every anniversary to come. It isn't just a reminder of Israel's legitimacy; it's a reminder of Arab responsibility. The writer is founding president emeritus of Shalem College in Jerusalem and a visiting fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. 2017-11-28 00:00:00Full Article
Why the 1947 UN Partition Resolution Must Be Celebrated
(Mosaic) Martin Kramer - Compared with the festivities surrounding the Balfour Declaration centenary, relatively little attention is being paid to the 70th anniversary of the UN partition vote. But there is a compelling reason to emphasize the 1947 resolution, and to do so time and again. That reason: the Arabs rejected it. And because they did, preferring war, they cannot escape their share of responsibility for the war's consequences: their nakba. Evasion of responsibility explains why the Palestinians, in telling the saga of their "dispossession," stress the Balfour Declaration and downplay the partition resolution. Prior to the 1947 vote, the UN General Assembly empowered UNSCOP, comprising representatives of 11 uninvolved member-states, to investigate the situation and make recommendations. This is now standard procedure in the handling of conflicts. But Palestinian Arab leaders at the time boycotted UNSCOP. In the Arab view, the Jews had no right to anything. They thought that once the British left, they would defeat the Jews. Why concede anything to a motley mob of cowardly Jews? It took more than 60 years for a Palestinian leader, Mahmoud Abbas, to describe Palestinian and Arab rejection of partition as a "mistake" (in an interview in 2011). It is important to mark this anniversary of the UN partition vote and every anniversary to come. It isn't just a reminder of Israel's legitimacy; it's a reminder of Arab responsibility. The writer is founding president emeritus of Shalem College in Jerusalem and a visiting fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. 2017-11-28 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|