Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(American Enterprise Institute) Kenneth Pollack - I would like nothing more than to see a peaceful relationship between the U.S. and Iran. I was President Clinton's Director for Persian Gulf Affairs at the National Security Council and ardently supported his bid at rapprochement with Iran's reformist president, Mohamed Khatami. Similarly, when the Obama administration sought not only a nuclear deal with Iran but a full-fledged transformation of the relationship, I publicly and privately supported them as well. With the failure of all of these bids to reach out to Iran, Obama's in particular, it is clear that the men who run Iran's foreign policy have no interest in a better relationship with the U.S. They continue to define the U.S. as their enemy, and they treat us accordingly. After so many sincere approaches, and after getting shut out so many times, I think it inescapable that we conclude that the fault lies not in ourselves but in our foes. The Iranians never had an American president more willing to accommodate their needs and fears than President Obama, and they once again spurned him. The simplest explanation, the one most consistent with Iran's past behavior, and the one most obviously correct is that Ayatollah Khamenei and the rest of Iran's leadership were not interested in the better relationship that Obama and Secretary of State Kerry craved. It is hard to conclude anything other than that Tehran is determined to treat the U.S. as its enemy. Moreover, Iran actively threatens America's interests and allies in the Middle East. Israel is the best known of America's allies threatened (and attacked) by Iran through a variety of proxies and allies. With Iran's lavish backing and encouragement, Hizbullah continues to arm and insist that it will eradicate the Jewish state. And the Iranians themselves continue to boast of their determination to destroy Israel. The Iranian regime backs virtually anyone willing to employ violence to subvert the status quo and/or fight the U.S. and its allies. Thus, I believe it incumbent upon the U.S. to confront an Iran that has repeatedly demonstrated that it will not compromise or cooperate, and only seeks conflict. The writer, a former CIA analyst, is a resident scholar at AEI. 2018-05-03 00:00:00Full Article
Why Push Back on Iran?
(American Enterprise Institute) Kenneth Pollack - I would like nothing more than to see a peaceful relationship between the U.S. and Iran. I was President Clinton's Director for Persian Gulf Affairs at the National Security Council and ardently supported his bid at rapprochement with Iran's reformist president, Mohamed Khatami. Similarly, when the Obama administration sought not only a nuclear deal with Iran but a full-fledged transformation of the relationship, I publicly and privately supported them as well. With the failure of all of these bids to reach out to Iran, Obama's in particular, it is clear that the men who run Iran's foreign policy have no interest in a better relationship with the U.S. They continue to define the U.S. as their enemy, and they treat us accordingly. After so many sincere approaches, and after getting shut out so many times, I think it inescapable that we conclude that the fault lies not in ourselves but in our foes. The Iranians never had an American president more willing to accommodate their needs and fears than President Obama, and they once again spurned him. The simplest explanation, the one most consistent with Iran's past behavior, and the one most obviously correct is that Ayatollah Khamenei and the rest of Iran's leadership were not interested in the better relationship that Obama and Secretary of State Kerry craved. It is hard to conclude anything other than that Tehran is determined to treat the U.S. as its enemy. Moreover, Iran actively threatens America's interests and allies in the Middle East. Israel is the best known of America's allies threatened (and attacked) by Iran through a variety of proxies and allies. With Iran's lavish backing and encouragement, Hizbullah continues to arm and insist that it will eradicate the Jewish state. And the Iranians themselves continue to boast of their determination to destroy Israel. The Iranian regime backs virtually anyone willing to employ violence to subvert the status quo and/or fight the U.S. and its allies. Thus, I believe it incumbent upon the U.S. to confront an Iran that has repeatedly demonstrated that it will not compromise or cooperate, and only seeks conflict. The writer, a former CIA analyst, is a resident scholar at AEI. 2018-05-03 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|