Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(National Interest) Peter Brookes - The Iran nuclear deal was a well-intentioned effort to limit Iran's nuclear program - including its nuclear weapons program. But Tehran didn't sign up to limit its nuclear-power (or weapons) program forever, and the JCPOA essentially kicks the can down the road to the next president after Trump. Despite early calls for it to do so, the JCPOA doesn't fully address Iran's ballistic-missile program, a common delivery system for nuclear weapons. UN Security Council Resolutions 1929 and 2231 attempted to limit Iran's activities involving nuclear-capable ballistic missiles and Tehran has been accused of violating both resolutions. UN IAEA inspectors aren't allowed to check Iranian military sites. This is beyond comprehension, since nations are likely to develop nuclear weapons within the context of a military program. The writer, a Heritage Foundation senior fellow, is a former deputy assistant secretary of defense. 2018-05-11 00:00:00Full Article
The Nuclear Deal Hasn't Reduced Iran's Threat to International Security
(National Interest) Peter Brookes - The Iran nuclear deal was a well-intentioned effort to limit Iran's nuclear program - including its nuclear weapons program. But Tehran didn't sign up to limit its nuclear-power (or weapons) program forever, and the JCPOA essentially kicks the can down the road to the next president after Trump. Despite early calls for it to do so, the JCPOA doesn't fully address Iran's ballistic-missile program, a common delivery system for nuclear weapons. UN Security Council Resolutions 1929 and 2231 attempted to limit Iran's activities involving nuclear-capable ballistic missiles and Tehran has been accused of violating both resolutions. UN IAEA inspectors aren't allowed to check Iranian military sites. This is beyond comprehension, since nations are likely to develop nuclear weapons within the context of a military program. The writer, a Heritage Foundation senior fellow, is a former deputy assistant secretary of defense. 2018-05-11 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|