Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jewish Chronicle-UK) Daniel Sugarman - A few days ago I wrote a column about the latest round of violence on the border with Gaza. Seeing happy faces in Jerusalem on the television side-by-side with tear gas, smoke and bullets, I wrote, "You cannot tell me that Israel, a land of technological miracles...is incapable of coming up with a way of incapacitating protestors that does not include gunning dozens of them down." People pointed out that it was absurd to deal in hypotheticals. Saying that surely there must be another way the protestors could be stopped was a cry of anguish, but it was not an argument. If no such technology currently exists, then it was absurd of me to blame the IDF for not magically willing it into existence. I had fallen into the trap I had always been convinced I would not fall into. I had condemned Israel for defending itself. Shoot at those charging at you and Hamas would have its martyrs. Fail to shoot and Hamas would break through the barrier and bring suffering and death - its stated aim - to Israelis living only a few hundred meters away. The choice was, quite literally, shoot at people running at you with the stated aim of killing you and your families, or fail to shoot and let them do it. 2018-05-18 00:00:00Full Article
I Said Israel Should Be Ashamed about Gaza - I Was Wrong
(Jewish Chronicle-UK) Daniel Sugarman - A few days ago I wrote a column about the latest round of violence on the border with Gaza. Seeing happy faces in Jerusalem on the television side-by-side with tear gas, smoke and bullets, I wrote, "You cannot tell me that Israel, a land of technological miracles...is incapable of coming up with a way of incapacitating protestors that does not include gunning dozens of them down." People pointed out that it was absurd to deal in hypotheticals. Saying that surely there must be another way the protestors could be stopped was a cry of anguish, but it was not an argument. If no such technology currently exists, then it was absurd of me to blame the IDF for not magically willing it into existence. I had fallen into the trap I had always been convinced I would not fall into. I had condemned Israel for defending itself. Shoot at those charging at you and Hamas would have its martyrs. Fail to shoot and Hamas would break through the barrier and bring suffering and death - its stated aim - to Israelis living only a few hundred meters away. The choice was, quite literally, shoot at people running at you with the stated aim of killing you and your families, or fail to shoot and let them do it. 2018-05-18 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|