Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Bloomberg) Eli Lake - Last month, Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman said that Hizbullah was now "in complete control not just of the Lebanese [government], but also its army." Since 2007, the U.S. has provided $1.7 billion worth of aid and equipment to the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF). U.S. military leaders have assured Congress that U.S. equipment has not ended up in the hands of Hizbullah, and that the LAF has fought valiantly against Sunni jihadis like the Islamic State, working alongside American special operations forces. Many in Congress, however, are ready to write off the U.S. relationship with the LAF. The original goal of America's aid to Lebanon's military, during the George W. Bush administration, was to help the LAF implement UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which requires the military to disarm Lebanon's militias. In the last 11 years, the LAF has made zero progress in disarming Hizbullah. Last month, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) attached an amendment to the Senate defense authorization bill requiring the Pentagon and the State Department to assess how well the LAF is meeting the terms of Resolution 1701.2018-06-07 00:00:00Full Article
Congress Forces Pentagon to Come Clean on Aid to Lebanon
(Bloomberg) Eli Lake - Last month, Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman said that Hizbullah was now "in complete control not just of the Lebanese [government], but also its army." Since 2007, the U.S. has provided $1.7 billion worth of aid and equipment to the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF). U.S. military leaders have assured Congress that U.S. equipment has not ended up in the hands of Hizbullah, and that the LAF has fought valiantly against Sunni jihadis like the Islamic State, working alongside American special operations forces. Many in Congress, however, are ready to write off the U.S. relationship with the LAF. The original goal of America's aid to Lebanon's military, during the George W. Bush administration, was to help the LAF implement UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which requires the military to disarm Lebanon's militias. In the last 11 years, the LAF has made zero progress in disarming Hizbullah. Last month, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) attached an amendment to the Senate defense authorization bill requiring the Pentagon and the State Department to assess how well the LAF is meeting the terms of Resolution 1701.2018-06-07 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|