Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Ha'aretz) Adi Schwartz and Einat Wilf - People are talking again about "reconstructing" Gaza. Yet as long as 3/4 of Gaza's residents perpetuate their status as refugees, there's no real possibility for rebuilding and developing Gaza. The problem is that Gaza's inhabitants do not view that land as their home, but rather as a transit camp they will inhabit until the day they can return to "Palestine." Because of this, they will prefer to invest their efforts and resources in returning to their "home" - by force if necessary - rather than cultivate the place where they currently reside. Clinging to their dream of return means a continuing war on Israel. The West, by providing the bulk of the funds for UNRWA's operations, unwittingly sustains the Palestinian idea that it is better to continue to struggle for "return" rather than come to terms with the legitimacy of Israel and build a new life of prosperity in Gaza. This has to change. Israel should insist that UNRWA's donor countries - the U.S., Australia, Britain and the EU - desist from supporting the Palestinian demand to annihilate Israel, by way of their support for UNRWA. UNRWA's essence makes it clear to Gaza's inhabitants that Gaza is not their true home.2018-06-08 00:00:00Full Article
How UNRWA Prevents Gaza from Thriving
(Ha'aretz) Adi Schwartz and Einat Wilf - People are talking again about "reconstructing" Gaza. Yet as long as 3/4 of Gaza's residents perpetuate their status as refugees, there's no real possibility for rebuilding and developing Gaza. The problem is that Gaza's inhabitants do not view that land as their home, but rather as a transit camp they will inhabit until the day they can return to "Palestine." Because of this, they will prefer to invest their efforts and resources in returning to their "home" - by force if necessary - rather than cultivate the place where they currently reside. Clinging to their dream of return means a continuing war on Israel. The West, by providing the bulk of the funds for UNRWA's operations, unwittingly sustains the Palestinian idea that it is better to continue to struggle for "return" rather than come to terms with the legitimacy of Israel and build a new life of prosperity in Gaza. This has to change. Israel should insist that UNRWA's donor countries - the U.S., Australia, Britain and the EU - desist from supporting the Palestinian demand to annihilate Israel, by way of their support for UNRWA. UNRWA's essence makes it clear to Gaza's inhabitants that Gaza is not their true home.2018-06-08 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|