Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Commentary) Matthew Continetti - Reasonable people and friends of Israel may disagree about the necessity and utility of the new nation-state law. Such disagreement, however, ought to be based on facts. The Los Angeles Times described the nation-state law as "granting an advantageous status to Jewish-only communities." But that is false: The bill contained no such language. The New York Times noted the law "omits any mention of democracy or the principle of equality." But that is because other Basic Laws already have codified the democratic and egalitarian character of Israel, including two laws dealing specifically with human rights. The nation-state law contains no additional rights for Jews; nor does it promulgate fewer rights for Arabs. A front-page article in the Times was headlined "Israel Picks Identity Over Democracy." This was a funny way to characterize a law that had been first introduced in 2011 by the centrist Kadima Party and won majority support, following parliamentary procedure, of a democratically elected legislative body. These often-hysterical reactions to the nation-state law use the legislation merely as a jumping-off point for larger complaints about Israel's Jewish character. The truth is that democracy is thriving in Israel. Last I checked, Israel is the one country in the Middle East where you can attend an LGBT Pride parade. The proportion of women serving in the Knesset is higher than in the U.S. Congress or average EU parliament. Minority citizens are guaranteed the same rights as Jewish ones. And it is precisely these achievements that are sustained by Israel's Jewish character and traditions. The writer is editor in chief of the Washington Free Beacon.2018-08-20 00:00:00Full Article
The Misrepresentation of Israel's Democracy
(Commentary) Matthew Continetti - Reasonable people and friends of Israel may disagree about the necessity and utility of the new nation-state law. Such disagreement, however, ought to be based on facts. The Los Angeles Times described the nation-state law as "granting an advantageous status to Jewish-only communities." But that is false: The bill contained no such language. The New York Times noted the law "omits any mention of democracy or the principle of equality." But that is because other Basic Laws already have codified the democratic and egalitarian character of Israel, including two laws dealing specifically with human rights. The nation-state law contains no additional rights for Jews; nor does it promulgate fewer rights for Arabs. A front-page article in the Times was headlined "Israel Picks Identity Over Democracy." This was a funny way to characterize a law that had been first introduced in 2011 by the centrist Kadima Party and won majority support, following parliamentary procedure, of a democratically elected legislative body. These often-hysterical reactions to the nation-state law use the legislation merely as a jumping-off point for larger complaints about Israel's Jewish character. The truth is that democracy is thriving in Israel. Last I checked, Israel is the one country in the Middle East where you can attend an LGBT Pride parade. The proportion of women serving in the Knesset is higher than in the U.S. Congress or average EU parliament. Minority citizens are guaranteed the same rights as Jewish ones. And it is precisely these achievements that are sustained by Israel's Jewish character and traditions. The writer is editor in chief of the Washington Free Beacon.2018-08-20 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|