Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Times-UK] David Aaronovitch - Why did the G8 countries take such a unanimously hard line against Hizballah when framing their joint reaction to the violence? Because what Hizballah has done - what Hizballah is doing - is intolerable to sovereign governments. An autonomous heavily armed militia, working from the territory of a state, has - without agreement from its own government (of which it is a part) - launched its own attacks on the territory of a neighbor. There is a whole cottage industry devoted to the reweaving of Hizballah as a kind of unique mixture of cool guerrillismo and charity organization, and its leader Hassan Nasrallah as the turbaned love-child of Gerry Adams and Bob Geldof. The closeness between the Iranian government and Hizballah can be judged by who supplies Hizballah's munitions. But why Iran judges that a party with 14 MPs in the Lebanese national parliament might require medium-range high-explosive missiles is a matter for some serious thought. Do we think that Israel's response is "proportionate"? By the way, if it isn't, then the Falklands campaign, in which deaths actually exceeded the population of the contested area, can only be described as grossly disproportionate. 2006-07-18 01:00:00Full Article
A Heavily Armed Militia Attacks Your Territory. What Are You Meant to Do?
[Times-UK] David Aaronovitch - Why did the G8 countries take such a unanimously hard line against Hizballah when framing their joint reaction to the violence? Because what Hizballah has done - what Hizballah is doing - is intolerable to sovereign governments. An autonomous heavily armed militia, working from the territory of a state, has - without agreement from its own government (of which it is a part) - launched its own attacks on the territory of a neighbor. There is a whole cottage industry devoted to the reweaving of Hizballah as a kind of unique mixture of cool guerrillismo and charity organization, and its leader Hassan Nasrallah as the turbaned love-child of Gerry Adams and Bob Geldof. The closeness between the Iranian government and Hizballah can be judged by who supplies Hizballah's munitions. But why Iran judges that a party with 14 MPs in the Lebanese national parliament might require medium-range high-explosive missiles is a matter for some serious thought. Do we think that Israel's response is "proportionate"? By the way, if it isn't, then the Falklands campaign, in which deaths actually exceeded the population of the contested area, can only be described as grossly disproportionate. 2006-07-18 01:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|