Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Institute for Science and International Security) David Albright, Olli Heinonen, and Andrea Stricker - According to the Nuclear Archive that Israel seized in Tehran earlier this year, by the end of 2003 Iran had put in place the infrastructure for a comprehensive nuclear weapons program. Iran intended to build five nuclear warheads by 2003, each with an explosive yield of 10 kilotons and able to be delivered by ballistic missile. Iran was preparing to conduct an underground test of a nuclear weapon, if necessary. The end goal was to have tested, deliverable nuclear weapons, and Iran made more progress toward that goal than was known before the seizure of the archives. It is the responsibility of the IAEA and member states to ensure that Iran's nuclear weapons program is ended in an irretrievable permanent manner, pursuant to in-depth verification that has not yet been carried out under Iran's comprehensive safeguards agreement, its provisional implementation of the Additional Protocol, and the JCPOA. Absence of progress on this critical issue is largely due to lack of Iranian cooperation. Moreover, there is no visible indication that the IAEA is yet acting on the new information. 2018-11-21 00:00:00Full Article
Iran's Nuclear Archive Shows It Planned to Build Five Nuclear Weapons by 2003
(Institute for Science and International Security) David Albright, Olli Heinonen, and Andrea Stricker - According to the Nuclear Archive that Israel seized in Tehran earlier this year, by the end of 2003 Iran had put in place the infrastructure for a comprehensive nuclear weapons program. Iran intended to build five nuclear warheads by 2003, each with an explosive yield of 10 kilotons and able to be delivered by ballistic missile. Iran was preparing to conduct an underground test of a nuclear weapon, if necessary. The end goal was to have tested, deliverable nuclear weapons, and Iran made more progress toward that goal than was known before the seizure of the archives. It is the responsibility of the IAEA and member states to ensure that Iran's nuclear weapons program is ended in an irretrievable permanent manner, pursuant to in-depth verification that has not yet been carried out under Iran's comprehensive safeguards agreement, its provisional implementation of the Additional Protocol, and the JCPOA. Absence of progress on this critical issue is largely due to lack of Iranian cooperation. Moreover, there is no visible indication that the IAEA is yet acting on the new information. 2018-11-21 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|