Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Military Times) Todd South - A three-day federal trial that began this week pits a New Jersey and an Arkansas law firm against the Islamic Republic of Iran, alleging that the regime funneled funds, personnel and training in a long-running and deeply organized plot to exact as much damage as possible on U.S. and coalition troops in Iraq. If successful, the more than 200 plaintiffs in this case could be considered eligible to receive confiscated or forfeited funds being gathered in an account for victims of terrorist acts. This week's case focuses on 90 separate attacks and the victims and their families who've suffered death, dismemberment and lifelong trauma as a result of Iran's campaign. They want $10 billion. The majority of the attacks against U.S. troops in Iraq involved the sophisticated, Iranian-designed and supplied, explosively formed penetrator, or EFP. Army Lt.-Gen. (ret.) Michael Oates was asked, "Did the U.S. ever develop a successful countermeasure for the EFP?" "No," Oates said. "Did Iran ever suffer any consequences for its support and development of EFPs?" "No," Oates said. 2018-12-06 00:00:00Full Article
Victims Look to Punish Iran for Attacks Against U.S. Troops in Iraq
(Military Times) Todd South - A three-day federal trial that began this week pits a New Jersey and an Arkansas law firm against the Islamic Republic of Iran, alleging that the regime funneled funds, personnel and training in a long-running and deeply organized plot to exact as much damage as possible on U.S. and coalition troops in Iraq. If successful, the more than 200 plaintiffs in this case could be considered eligible to receive confiscated or forfeited funds being gathered in an account for victims of terrorist acts. This week's case focuses on 90 separate attacks and the victims and their families who've suffered death, dismemberment and lifelong trauma as a result of Iran's campaign. They want $10 billion. The majority of the attacks against U.S. troops in Iraq involved the sophisticated, Iranian-designed and supplied, explosively formed penetrator, or EFP. Army Lt.-Gen. (ret.) Michael Oates was asked, "Did the U.S. ever develop a successful countermeasure for the EFP?" "No," Oates said. "Did Iran ever suffer any consequences for its support and development of EFPs?" "No," Oates said. 2018-12-06 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|