Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) Emily B. Landau - The Europeans have been doing everything in their power to undermine U.S. efforts to recreate pressure on Iran as a starting point for a new negotiation that would cover its nuclear, missile and regional activities. France, Britain and Germany envision an alternative payment system that will enable them to continue trade with Iran despite U.S. sanctions. But do the Europeans not recognize that there are serious flaws in the nuclear deal and that it would not prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear state? Don't they see that it is in everyone's interest to try to strengthen the deal, especially since Iran has become an even more aggressive regional actor since the deal came into force? The horror of the Islamic regime is clear to see: the war crimes in Syria, the transport of weapons and advanced technologies to Hizbullah, the testing of missiles that can carry a nuclear warhead, and the steadfast refusal to allow the IAEA to inspect non-nuclear facilities (especially those revealed in the nuclear archives), to name a few. Iran made only minimal nuclear concessions to secure maximum sanctions relief. It has given no indication of a strategic U-turn in the nuclear realm, and continues to threaten Israel with destruction. Moreover, the deal itself ensures that Iran can continue with its nuclear program, allowing R&D work on an entire range of advanced centrifuges. It excludes Iran's missile program, which it continues to advance virtually unhindered. Finally, the deal has an expiration date, so it is at best a temporary arrangement. It flies in the face of reason that the Europeans don't see what a dangerous nuclear proliferator Iran still is. The writer heads the Arms Control and Regional Security Program at the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS). 2018-12-14 00:00:00Full Article
How Europe Has Gone Astray on Iran
(Jerusalem Post) Emily B. Landau - The Europeans have been doing everything in their power to undermine U.S. efforts to recreate pressure on Iran as a starting point for a new negotiation that would cover its nuclear, missile and regional activities. France, Britain and Germany envision an alternative payment system that will enable them to continue trade with Iran despite U.S. sanctions. But do the Europeans not recognize that there are serious flaws in the nuclear deal and that it would not prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear state? Don't they see that it is in everyone's interest to try to strengthen the deal, especially since Iran has become an even more aggressive regional actor since the deal came into force? The horror of the Islamic regime is clear to see: the war crimes in Syria, the transport of weapons and advanced technologies to Hizbullah, the testing of missiles that can carry a nuclear warhead, and the steadfast refusal to allow the IAEA to inspect non-nuclear facilities (especially those revealed in the nuclear archives), to name a few. Iran made only minimal nuclear concessions to secure maximum sanctions relief. It has given no indication of a strategic U-turn in the nuclear realm, and continues to threaten Israel with destruction. Moreover, the deal itself ensures that Iran can continue with its nuclear program, allowing R&D work on an entire range of advanced centrifuges. It excludes Iran's missile program, which it continues to advance virtually unhindered. Finally, the deal has an expiration date, so it is at best a temporary arrangement. It flies in the face of reason that the Europeans don't see what a dangerous nuclear proliferator Iran still is. The writer heads the Arms Control and Regional Security Program at the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS). 2018-12-14 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|