Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Institute for Contemporary Affairs-Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs) Amb. Alan Baker - The election of the Palestinian Attorney-General, Dr. Ahmad Barrak, to serve as a member of the "Advisory Committee on Nominations" of judges of the International Criminal Court is indicative of a far wider and more serious problem facing the ICC. By any international, legal and factual criterion, "The State of Palestine" is nothing more than a political fiction invented and given prominence by the UN General Assembly. There exists no sovereign Palestinian state, and there exists no sovereign Palestinian territory over which the ICC could exercise its jurisdiction. The acceptance in 2014 of the "State of Palestine" as a party to the 1998 Rome Statute of the ICC remains legally flawed, since membership of the Court, pursuant to its Statute, is restricted to states, and there exists no sovereign Palestinian state. The Palestinian leadership has little interest in the vision, aims, and purpose of the ICC, so laboriously negotiated and drafted over many years by the international community. Their only purpose for engaging the ICC is to utilize the Court politically in their campaign to delegitimize Israel and its leadership. It is widely acknowledged that the final status of the West Bank and Gaza is an open negotiating issue between the Palestinians and Israel pursuant to the Oslo Accords. Pending their final settlement, the territories cannot be regarded as Palestinian territories but as disputed territories. Hence, any determination by the UN or by the ICC as to any form of Palestinian status of the territories cannot be seen as other than an attempt to prejudge the outcome of the permanent status negotiations. However, this has not prevented the international community from blindly accepting and advancing this parallel Palestinian attempt to bypass their negotiating commitment in order to achieve statehood unilaterally through international bodies. The writer, former legal adviser and deputy director-general of Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, participated in the negotiation and drafting of the Oslo Accords with the Palestinians. 2018-12-26 00:00:00Full Article
Setting the Wolf to Guard the Sheep: Electing the Palestinian Attorney-General to the ICC Nominations Committee for Judges
(Institute for Contemporary Affairs-Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs) Amb. Alan Baker - The election of the Palestinian Attorney-General, Dr. Ahmad Barrak, to serve as a member of the "Advisory Committee on Nominations" of judges of the International Criminal Court is indicative of a far wider and more serious problem facing the ICC. By any international, legal and factual criterion, "The State of Palestine" is nothing more than a political fiction invented and given prominence by the UN General Assembly. There exists no sovereign Palestinian state, and there exists no sovereign Palestinian territory over which the ICC could exercise its jurisdiction. The acceptance in 2014 of the "State of Palestine" as a party to the 1998 Rome Statute of the ICC remains legally flawed, since membership of the Court, pursuant to its Statute, is restricted to states, and there exists no sovereign Palestinian state. The Palestinian leadership has little interest in the vision, aims, and purpose of the ICC, so laboriously negotiated and drafted over many years by the international community. Their only purpose for engaging the ICC is to utilize the Court politically in their campaign to delegitimize Israel and its leadership. It is widely acknowledged that the final status of the West Bank and Gaza is an open negotiating issue between the Palestinians and Israel pursuant to the Oslo Accords. Pending their final settlement, the territories cannot be regarded as Palestinian territories but as disputed territories. Hence, any determination by the UN or by the ICC as to any form of Palestinian status of the territories cannot be seen as other than an attempt to prejudge the outcome of the permanent status negotiations. However, this has not prevented the international community from blindly accepting and advancing this parallel Palestinian attempt to bypass their negotiating commitment in order to achieve statehood unilaterally through international bodies. The writer, former legal adviser and deputy director-general of Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, participated in the negotiation and drafting of the Oslo Accords with the Palestinians. 2018-12-26 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|