Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(City A.M.-UK) Alan Mendoza - There is no longer a peace process worthy of the name that an Israeli leader can endorse with any credibility. The story of the negotiations of the past quarter-century has been one of constant and increasing Israeli concessions in an attempt to get the Palestinians over the line of peace, and Palestinian rejectionism in response. The last time a major deal was presented - in 2008 when Ehud Olmert offered up the keys to Jerusalem - the Palestinians did not even deign to provide a formal reply. It is not hard to understand why. The pattern of negotiations has shown a ratchet effect, with each new round starting from where the previous failed negotiation ended. For a Palestinian, waiting it out to the next deal therefore becomes a very tempting proposition. At the same time, the Palestinians have been unable to negotiate national unity themselves, so the idea that they could reach agreement with Israel - even if they wanted to - is remote. The writer is executive director of the Henry Jackson Society. 2019-04-12 00:00:00Full Article
A Dose of Reality on the Peace Process
(City A.M.-UK) Alan Mendoza - There is no longer a peace process worthy of the name that an Israeli leader can endorse with any credibility. The story of the negotiations of the past quarter-century has been one of constant and increasing Israeli concessions in an attempt to get the Palestinians over the line of peace, and Palestinian rejectionism in response. The last time a major deal was presented - in 2008 when Ehud Olmert offered up the keys to Jerusalem - the Palestinians did not even deign to provide a formal reply. It is not hard to understand why. The pattern of negotiations has shown a ratchet effect, with each new round starting from where the previous failed negotiation ended. For a Palestinian, waiting it out to the next deal therefore becomes a very tempting proposition. At the same time, the Palestinians have been unable to negotiate national unity themselves, so the idea that they could reach agreement with Israel - even if they wanted to - is remote. The writer is executive director of the Henry Jackson Society. 2019-04-12 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|