Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Jerusalem Post] Naftali Balanson - Whenever a highly political, non-governmental organization (NGO) - funded by the EU and European governments - issues a report on alleged Israeli human rights violations, the media uncritically promote it, regardless of the NGO's credibility or the veracity of the allegations. This "halo effect," whereby the claims of human rights groups are accepted without a modicum of scrutiny, often results in Israel's vilification and demonization. By dint of its presumed independence and stated lofty goals, the NGO is considered more truthful than the Israeli government. The media pits universal human rights against Israel, leaving it to respond on the defensive. By publishing these stories, the media reinforces the halo effect and becomes partner to the damage done. The writer is managing editor of NGO Monitor. 2008-08-15 01:00:00Full Article
The "Halo Effect" Shields NGOs from Media Scrutiny
[Jerusalem Post] Naftali Balanson - Whenever a highly political, non-governmental organization (NGO) - funded by the EU and European governments - issues a report on alleged Israeli human rights violations, the media uncritically promote it, regardless of the NGO's credibility or the veracity of the allegations. This "halo effect," whereby the claims of human rights groups are accepted without a modicum of scrutiny, often results in Israel's vilification and demonization. By dint of its presumed independence and stated lofty goals, the NGO is considered more truthful than the Israeli government. The media pits universal human rights against Israel, leaving it to respond on the defensive. By publishing these stories, the media reinforces the halo effect and becomes partner to the damage done. The writer is managing editor of NGO Monitor. 2008-08-15 01:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|