Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Mosaic) Michael Doran - Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei intends to raise the specter of war and simultaneously offer a cooperative way to exorcise it, namely, by returning America to the Iran deal (JCPOA). Thanks to the nuclear archive that an Israeli operation spirited out of Iran last year, the U.S. has enough information to argue persuasively that Iran has, in fact, grossly violated the JCPOA. The archive reveals, among other things, that Iran never abandoned its nuclear-weapons program but simply restructured it, emphasizing dual-use activities that have allowed Tehran to claim with a modicum of plausibility that its nuclear activities are "peaceful" and "civilian." The JCPOA helped advance this deception by bestowing international legitimacy on facilities like the Fordow bunker. Built under a mountain, Fordow never had any purpose other than to produce weapons-grade uranium. The great conceit of the previous U.S. approach to Iran was to believe that there existed a clever diplomatic way to stop it from getting a nuclear bomb. There is not. Iran's nuclear-weapons program will come to an end only if the U.S. wrests it from the talons of the regime. This need not mean war, but it will require a prolonged coercive strategy. The great paradox is that the more successfully the U.S. transmits a readiness for war, the less likely war will become. The writer, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, is a former deputy assistant secretary of defense and a former senior director of the National Security Council. 2019-06-26 00:00:00Full Article
What Iran Is Really Up To
(Mosaic) Michael Doran - Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei intends to raise the specter of war and simultaneously offer a cooperative way to exorcise it, namely, by returning America to the Iran deal (JCPOA). Thanks to the nuclear archive that an Israeli operation spirited out of Iran last year, the U.S. has enough information to argue persuasively that Iran has, in fact, grossly violated the JCPOA. The archive reveals, among other things, that Iran never abandoned its nuclear-weapons program but simply restructured it, emphasizing dual-use activities that have allowed Tehran to claim with a modicum of plausibility that its nuclear activities are "peaceful" and "civilian." The JCPOA helped advance this deception by bestowing international legitimacy on facilities like the Fordow bunker. Built under a mountain, Fordow never had any purpose other than to produce weapons-grade uranium. The great conceit of the previous U.S. approach to Iran was to believe that there existed a clever diplomatic way to stop it from getting a nuclear bomb. There is not. Iran's nuclear-weapons program will come to an end only if the U.S. wrests it from the talons of the regime. This need not mean war, but it will require a prolonged coercive strategy. The great paradox is that the more successfully the U.S. transmits a readiness for war, the less likely war will become. The writer, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, is a former deputy assistant secretary of defense and a former senior director of the National Security Council. 2019-06-26 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|