Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[New York Times] Zev Chafets - In response to the news from Iran, some supporters of Israel such as Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer have suggested that the failed efforts to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons be replaced by assured American deterrence: any Iranian nuclear attack on Israel would be treated as an attack on the U.S. From Israel's perspective, the thought is tempting - but it's not realistic. In 1981, when Israeli planes destroyed the Iraqi nuclear reactor at Osirak, even the Reagan administration, usually a close ally, denounced the operation. Prime Minister Menachem Begin explained that he felt obligated to do anything in his power to stop Israel's enemies from getting their hands on means of mass killing. His primary focus was strategic. Israel would bear the ultimate responsibility for its own security. Don't misunderstand. It would be a noble thing for the U.S. to support Israel's efforts to stop an Iranian bomb or, if it comes to that, to back Israel's response to an attack. But no country can rely on the kindness of others. 2008-04-16 01:00:00Full Article
Israel Can Stand Up for Itself
[New York Times] Zev Chafets - In response to the news from Iran, some supporters of Israel such as Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer have suggested that the failed efforts to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons be replaced by assured American deterrence: any Iranian nuclear attack on Israel would be treated as an attack on the U.S. From Israel's perspective, the thought is tempting - but it's not realistic. In 1981, when Israeli planes destroyed the Iraqi nuclear reactor at Osirak, even the Reagan administration, usually a close ally, denounced the operation. Prime Minister Menachem Begin explained that he felt obligated to do anything in his power to stop Israel's enemies from getting their hands on means of mass killing. His primary focus was strategic. Israel would bear the ultimate responsibility for its own security. Don't misunderstand. It would be a noble thing for the U.S. to support Israel's efforts to stop an Iranian bomb or, if it comes to that, to back Israel's response to an attack. But no country can rely on the kindness of others. 2008-04-16 01:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|