Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Independent-UK) Dr. Majid Rafizadeh - The past year has seen European allies contort themselves in attempting to keep the Iran nuclear deal alive. Not only is that not possible, but it should no longer be attempted. The deal was fundamentally flawed from the start. The composition of the negotiating team completely excluded those on Iran's doorstep, with policy set by governments thousands of miles away, in an approach reminiscent of a bygone colonial era. The funding of violent proxies, in the form of Hizbullah, Hamas and the Houthis, was entirely overlooked in a way it never would have been had the Gulf states or Israel been at the table. In fact, the deal freed up extra funds which have flowed to these groups in ever greater volumes. The result has been a greater propensity for Houthi rocket launches at civilian targets in Saudi Arabia, the deployment of thousands of Hizbullah foot soldiers in Syria, and the constant bombardment of Israel by Iranian-funded Hamas rockets. The Strait of Hormuz, the world's busiest shipping corridor, now requires commercial shipping to be escorted by allied naval vessels. It's clear that since the deal's implementation, the national security interests of U.S. allies in the region have far from improved. The latest Iranian actions against shipping are the desperate acts of a nation whose funding sources for regional destabilization are drying up. The response to Iranian belligerence cannot simply be further appeasement. That route has been tried and that route has failed. The security threats Iran poses to both regional and international security are real and urgent. Attempting to revive the failed Iran deal is not the way to combat them. The writer is a political scientist at Harvard University. 2019-08-26 00:00:00Full Article
The Security Threat Iran Poses Is Real and Urgent
(Independent-UK) Dr. Majid Rafizadeh - The past year has seen European allies contort themselves in attempting to keep the Iran nuclear deal alive. Not only is that not possible, but it should no longer be attempted. The deal was fundamentally flawed from the start. The composition of the negotiating team completely excluded those on Iran's doorstep, with policy set by governments thousands of miles away, in an approach reminiscent of a bygone colonial era. The funding of violent proxies, in the form of Hizbullah, Hamas and the Houthis, was entirely overlooked in a way it never would have been had the Gulf states or Israel been at the table. In fact, the deal freed up extra funds which have flowed to these groups in ever greater volumes. The result has been a greater propensity for Houthi rocket launches at civilian targets in Saudi Arabia, the deployment of thousands of Hizbullah foot soldiers in Syria, and the constant bombardment of Israel by Iranian-funded Hamas rockets. The Strait of Hormuz, the world's busiest shipping corridor, now requires commercial shipping to be escorted by allied naval vessels. It's clear that since the deal's implementation, the national security interests of U.S. allies in the region have far from improved. The latest Iranian actions against shipping are the desperate acts of a nation whose funding sources for regional destabilization are drying up. The response to Iranian belligerence cannot simply be further appeasement. That route has been tried and that route has failed. The security threats Iran poses to both regional and international security are real and urgent. Attempting to revive the failed Iran deal is not the way to combat them. The writer is a political scientist at Harvard University. 2019-08-26 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|