Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(The Federalist) Erielle Davidson - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu never used the word "annexation" on Tuesday regarding his plan to formalize Israeli sovereignty in the Jordan Valley. Instead, he spoke of "applying sovereignty." There is a reason for his careful choice of wording, and for its mistranslation and misrepresentation abroad. A nation cannot annex land over which it already has sovereign claims. Yet foreign media is doing its best to portray the potential application of sovereignty in the Jordan Valley as illegitimate. In 1948, Jordan conquered the West Bank in a war of aggression aimed at destroying the Jewish state. Following the war, it was nearly unanimously held that Jordan did not possess any legitimate claim of sovereignty over the territory, so Israel's claims of sovereignty remained. Moreover, when Israel liberated the West Bank, it was understood by many scholars to be in accordance with Article 51 of the UN Charter, which permits a nation to act in self-defense. This may allow the non-aggressor to assume control over territory previously held by the aggressor. 2019-09-12 00:00:00Full Article
Israel's Sovereignty Claims over the Jordan Valley Are Legitimate
(The Federalist) Erielle Davidson - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu never used the word "annexation" on Tuesday regarding his plan to formalize Israeli sovereignty in the Jordan Valley. Instead, he spoke of "applying sovereignty." There is a reason for his careful choice of wording, and for its mistranslation and misrepresentation abroad. A nation cannot annex land over which it already has sovereign claims. Yet foreign media is doing its best to portray the potential application of sovereignty in the Jordan Valley as illegitimate. In 1948, Jordan conquered the West Bank in a war of aggression aimed at destroying the Jewish state. Following the war, it was nearly unanimously held that Jordan did not possess any legitimate claim of sovereignty over the territory, so Israel's claims of sovereignty remained. Moreover, when Israel liberated the West Bank, it was understood by many scholars to be in accordance with Article 51 of the UN Charter, which permits a nation to act in self-defense. This may allow the non-aggressor to assume control over territory previously held by the aggressor. 2019-09-12 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|