Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Foreign Policy) Steven A. Cook - Over the last five decades, successive Israeli governments have invested in the development of cities and towns in the West Bank as well as the infrastructure necessary to link them to cities and towns in Israel. It defies logic to believe that Israel would ever give up on this long-term project. Yet that is exactly what folks inside the Beltway, including long-term Israel watchers, former officials, and opinion writers, have been doing for years. The Second Intifada should have laid bare the bankruptcy of the peace process. The dirty war that ensued was a searing experience for Israelis and Palestinians alike. Israel's national zeitgeist went from Prime Minister Shimon Peres' "New Middle East" to Netanyahu's "there is no partner [for peace]" and has never shifted back. The view that the U.S. can pressure Israel into giving up annexation also does not make sense against the backdrop of the West Bank's historical weight. It is, after all, the cradle of Judaism. It has also become the holy of holies in terms of Israeli security, all the more so since Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's unilateral withdrawal from Gaza resulted in years of rocket fire on adjacent Israeli towns. The lesson Israelis learned from that experience is clear: hold on to territory, international condemnation be damned. Under these circumstances, regardless of whatever incentives or threats the U.S. can bring to bear, they are unlikely to work, given the way Israelis have defined the stakes - life or death. The writer is a senior fellow for Middle East and Africa studies at the Council on Foreign Relations.2020-05-12 00:00:00Full Article
Moves to Extend Israeli Sovereignty to Parts of West Bank Shouldn't Have Come as a Surprise. It Is, after all, the Cradle of Judaism
(Foreign Policy) Steven A. Cook - Over the last five decades, successive Israeli governments have invested in the development of cities and towns in the West Bank as well as the infrastructure necessary to link them to cities and towns in Israel. It defies logic to believe that Israel would ever give up on this long-term project. Yet that is exactly what folks inside the Beltway, including long-term Israel watchers, former officials, and opinion writers, have been doing for years. The Second Intifada should have laid bare the bankruptcy of the peace process. The dirty war that ensued was a searing experience for Israelis and Palestinians alike. Israel's national zeitgeist went from Prime Minister Shimon Peres' "New Middle East" to Netanyahu's "there is no partner [for peace]" and has never shifted back. The view that the U.S. can pressure Israel into giving up annexation also does not make sense against the backdrop of the West Bank's historical weight. It is, after all, the cradle of Judaism. It has also become the holy of holies in terms of Israeli security, all the more so since Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's unilateral withdrawal from Gaza resulted in years of rocket fire on adjacent Israeli towns. The lesson Israelis learned from that experience is clear: hold on to territory, international condemnation be damned. Under these circumstances, regardless of whatever incentives or threats the U.S. can bring to bear, they are unlikely to work, given the way Israelis have defined the stakes - life or death. The writer is a senior fellow for Middle East and Africa studies at the Council on Foreign Relations.2020-05-12 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|