Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) Jason Greenblatt - On Friday, an opinion piece by Yousef al-Otaiba, UAE ambassador to the U.S., was published in an Israeli newspaper. I spent three years at the White House working to bring Israel and its Arab neighbors closer, and I commend Otaiba for writing it. I am glad he spoke directly to an Israeli audience. I strongly disagree with parts of the op-ed. For example, I don't agree that the extension of Israeli sovereignty to the areas being contemplated would be an illegal seizure of land. The U.S. government also does not believe so. I also strongly disagree with his use of the term "Palestinian land." It is not Palestinian land. It is land that is disputed, and the only way to resolve this is if the two sides can negotiate a settlement of the dispute directly together. The leadership in Ramallah rejected the vision for peace before it was even published. Indeed, they rejected, again and again, plans and ideas put forward by prior U.S. administrations. Our view was that the leadership in Ramallah should no longer have a veto on what happens to this land and to the Israelis living there. After spending countless hours throughout the Arab capitals over three years, I came to learn that we agree on far more than we disagree on. Despite our deep differences on some of these issues, I will forever be grateful that in some capitals in the region the leadership was always willing to have frank, sincere, and in some cases very surprising conversations. These difficult discussions and debates, including the topics covered in the op-ed by my friend Yousef, have to happen to make meaningful progress. The writer was the White House's Middle East envoy for nearly three years.2020-06-15 00:00:00Full Article
Applying Israeli Law in West Bank Is Not Illegal
(Jerusalem Post) Jason Greenblatt - On Friday, an opinion piece by Yousef al-Otaiba, UAE ambassador to the U.S., was published in an Israeli newspaper. I spent three years at the White House working to bring Israel and its Arab neighbors closer, and I commend Otaiba for writing it. I am glad he spoke directly to an Israeli audience. I strongly disagree with parts of the op-ed. For example, I don't agree that the extension of Israeli sovereignty to the areas being contemplated would be an illegal seizure of land. The U.S. government also does not believe so. I also strongly disagree with his use of the term "Palestinian land." It is not Palestinian land. It is land that is disputed, and the only way to resolve this is if the two sides can negotiate a settlement of the dispute directly together. The leadership in Ramallah rejected the vision for peace before it was even published. Indeed, they rejected, again and again, plans and ideas put forward by prior U.S. administrations. Our view was that the leadership in Ramallah should no longer have a veto on what happens to this land and to the Israelis living there. After spending countless hours throughout the Arab capitals over three years, I came to learn that we agree on far more than we disagree on. Despite our deep differences on some of these issues, I will forever be grateful that in some capitals in the region the leadership was always willing to have frank, sincere, and in some cases very surprising conversations. These difficult discussions and debates, including the topics covered in the op-ed by my friend Yousef, have to happen to make meaningful progress. The writer was the White House's Middle East envoy for nearly three years.2020-06-15 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|