Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(BESA Center for Strategic Studies-Bar-Ilan University) Prof. Hillel Frisch - There is no doubt that security cooperation with the PA contributed to a reduction in terrorism. The questions are how much, and whether or not the Israel Security Agency and the IDF can make up the difference. Even with close security cooperation, it was Israel, not PA security forces, who apprehended at least 75% of those suspected of terrorism. Contemporary history provides a good lesson that undue reliance on external security intelligence without the building of internal capabilities can backfire - especially with regard to human intelligence, which involves building informant networks in enemy territory. A lull in security cooperation could be a blessing in disguise, leading to greater organizational innovation and self-reliance for Israel's security forces. The writer is a professor of political and Middle East studies at Bar-Ilan University and a senior research associate at its Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies. 2020-07-02 00:00:00Full Article
The Benefits of Decreased Security Cooperation with the PA
(BESA Center for Strategic Studies-Bar-Ilan University) Prof. Hillel Frisch - There is no doubt that security cooperation with the PA contributed to a reduction in terrorism. The questions are how much, and whether or not the Israel Security Agency and the IDF can make up the difference. Even with close security cooperation, it was Israel, not PA security forces, who apprehended at least 75% of those suspected of terrorism. Contemporary history provides a good lesson that undue reliance on external security intelligence without the building of internal capabilities can backfire - especially with regard to human intelligence, which involves building informant networks in enemy territory. A lull in security cooperation could be a blessing in disguise, leading to greater organizational innovation and self-reliance for Israel's security forces. The writer is a professor of political and Middle East studies at Bar-Ilan University and a senior research associate at its Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies. 2020-07-02 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|