Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(American Purpose) Michael Mandelbaum - For three decades, successive American presidents invested diplomatic capital and their own time in the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. The effort failed in the past and is doomed to fail in the future because the Palestinians do not want a Palestinian state that would exist peacefully next to Israel. Their overriding goal is the destruction of Israel and they will enter into no arrangements that require their acceptance of a Jewish state in the Middle East as permanent and legitimate. Over the years the Palestinians have provided massive and incontrovertible evidence that this is in fact their position. They have refused several generous Israeli offers of statehood and have offered no proposals of their own in return. They have taken no serious, concrete steps to prepare for statehood, and in their public statements and the curricula of their schools they have relentlessly anathematized the idea as well as the fact of Jewish sovereignty. Palestinian negotiators have consistently stipulated as a nonnegotiable demand a "right of return" for anyone who can claim descent from anyone who left the British Mandate of Palestine in 1948. Such a claim has no moral, legal, or historical foundation, and it has served as a weapon in the Palestinians' ongoing campaign to destroy the state of the Jews rather than create their own. Palestinians became refugees in 1948 because, and only because, of the war of annihilation that first local Palestinians and then five Arab countries launched against the Jewish state. The Biden Administration should observe the diplomatic equivalent of the Hippocratic Oath in medicine: it should do no harm. Persisting in trying to broker an agreement while the Palestinians insist on a right of return does do harm. It encourages the Palestinians to believe, or at least to hope, that the American government does not oppose the elimination of Israel, which in turn gives them reason to continue to seek it. The writer is Professor Emeritus of American Foreign Policy at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies.2020-11-26 00:00:00Full Article
Why the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Can't Be Solved
(American Purpose) Michael Mandelbaum - For three decades, successive American presidents invested diplomatic capital and their own time in the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. The effort failed in the past and is doomed to fail in the future because the Palestinians do not want a Palestinian state that would exist peacefully next to Israel. Their overriding goal is the destruction of Israel and they will enter into no arrangements that require their acceptance of a Jewish state in the Middle East as permanent and legitimate. Over the years the Palestinians have provided massive and incontrovertible evidence that this is in fact their position. They have refused several generous Israeli offers of statehood and have offered no proposals of their own in return. They have taken no serious, concrete steps to prepare for statehood, and in their public statements and the curricula of their schools they have relentlessly anathematized the idea as well as the fact of Jewish sovereignty. Palestinian negotiators have consistently stipulated as a nonnegotiable demand a "right of return" for anyone who can claim descent from anyone who left the British Mandate of Palestine in 1948. Such a claim has no moral, legal, or historical foundation, and it has served as a weapon in the Palestinians' ongoing campaign to destroy the state of the Jews rather than create their own. Palestinians became refugees in 1948 because, and only because, of the war of annihilation that first local Palestinians and then five Arab countries launched against the Jewish state. The Biden Administration should observe the diplomatic equivalent of the Hippocratic Oath in medicine: it should do no harm. Persisting in trying to broker an agreement while the Palestinians insist on a right of return does do harm. It encourages the Palestinians to believe, or at least to hope, that the American government does not oppose the elimination of Israel, which in turn gives them reason to continue to seek it. The writer is Professor Emeritus of American Foreign Policy at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies.2020-11-26 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|