Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(JNS) Israel Kasnett - Former U.S. Ambassador to Israel David Friedman told the Tikvah Fund's Jewish Leadership Conference last week that at the start of his term four years ago, the world was giving the Palestinians "a pass on egregious human-rights violations, a pass on the inability of Hamas and the PA to ever coalesce on anything, a pass on terrorism, a pass on pay-to-slay, a pass on not creating any of the institutions necessary for an economy...and yet people were talking about a Palestinian state. This was putting the cart before the horse." Friedman said, "The most wrong was the indulgence of the Palestinian cause to the point where it negated the notion of accountability. There would be this equivalence between building settlements and acts of terrorism. You can be pro or against settlements, but you cannot possibly equate the two." The approach by other administrations was "leading to creating a dysfunctional terrorist state between Israel and Jordan. That was the path we inherited and we needed to reverse it quickly." "The important aspects of our plan were how to protect Israel's security and protect it from a terrorist Palestinian state. What we did...to depart from our predecessors is we created a means for Israel to protect itself under any scenario....Our predecessors came up with all sorts of gimmicks and gadgets and sensors along the Jordan River and things that were supposed to make Israel feel comfortable - and they didn't." "In this part of the world...it's all about strength. Strength keeps people safe and [keeps] the peace here....The weak find themselves at great peril. Our policy for four years was to project American strength within the region and support the exercise of strength by our allies." The message was clear that if Israel is attacked by its enemies, there would be "no restrictions whatsoever" on Israel to defend itself.2021-03-22 00:00:00Full Article
Former U.S. Ambassador David Friedman: In the Middle East, "Strength Keeps People Safe"
(JNS) Israel Kasnett - Former U.S. Ambassador to Israel David Friedman told the Tikvah Fund's Jewish Leadership Conference last week that at the start of his term four years ago, the world was giving the Palestinians "a pass on egregious human-rights violations, a pass on the inability of Hamas and the PA to ever coalesce on anything, a pass on terrorism, a pass on pay-to-slay, a pass on not creating any of the institutions necessary for an economy...and yet people were talking about a Palestinian state. This was putting the cart before the horse." Friedman said, "The most wrong was the indulgence of the Palestinian cause to the point where it negated the notion of accountability. There would be this equivalence between building settlements and acts of terrorism. You can be pro or against settlements, but you cannot possibly equate the two." The approach by other administrations was "leading to creating a dysfunctional terrorist state between Israel and Jordan. That was the path we inherited and we needed to reverse it quickly." "The important aspects of our plan were how to protect Israel's security and protect it from a terrorist Palestinian state. What we did...to depart from our predecessors is we created a means for Israel to protect itself under any scenario....Our predecessors came up with all sorts of gimmicks and gadgets and sensors along the Jordan River and things that were supposed to make Israel feel comfortable - and they didn't." "In this part of the world...it's all about strength. Strength keeps people safe and [keeps] the peace here....The weak find themselves at great peril. Our policy for four years was to project American strength within the region and support the exercise of strength by our allies." The message was clear that if Israel is attacked by its enemies, there would be "no restrictions whatsoever" on Israel to defend itself.2021-03-22 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|