Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Washington Times) Clifford D. May - I find it particularly distressing to see self-proclaimed human rights activists demonizing the world's most frequently threatened Jewish community. Human Rights Watch has just published a report, "A Threshold Crossed," declaring that Israel is committing "crimes of apartheid," which it calls "crimes against humanity" which "should trigger action." Apartheid regimes are illegitimate. Illegitimate regimes should be abolished. HRW is therefore providing justification for those whose goal is the abolition of the world's only Jewish-majority state, the refuge for Jews persecuted in or expelled from Europe, the Middle East, and elsewhere. The 20% of Israeli citizens who identify as Palestinians or Israeli Arabs vote, run for office, hold seats in the Israeli parliament, serve as judges including on Israel's Supreme Court, work as doctors in (not segregated) hospitals, attend (not segregated) universities, eat in (not segregated) restaurants, and relax on (not segregated) beaches. The same is true for Israeli Druze, Christians, Bedouins, Circassians, and other minorities about which HRW appears ignorant. To call that apartheid requires twisting the meaning of the word beyond recognition. In no other countries of the broader Middle East do ethnic and religious minorities enjoy similar rights and freedoms. This means HRW has chosen to apply a separate and unequal standard to Israel. That alone constitutes anti-Semitism. What's more, states throughout the broader Middle East proudly proclaim themselves Arab and/or Muslim. It is only Jewish identity and self-determination that HRW deems a "crime against humanity." It is HRW, not Israel, that has crossed a threshold. The writer is president of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. 2021-05-06 00:00:00Full Article
Human Rights Watch Crosses the Line with Latest Attack on Israel
(Washington Times) Clifford D. May - I find it particularly distressing to see self-proclaimed human rights activists demonizing the world's most frequently threatened Jewish community. Human Rights Watch has just published a report, "A Threshold Crossed," declaring that Israel is committing "crimes of apartheid," which it calls "crimes against humanity" which "should trigger action." Apartheid regimes are illegitimate. Illegitimate regimes should be abolished. HRW is therefore providing justification for those whose goal is the abolition of the world's only Jewish-majority state, the refuge for Jews persecuted in or expelled from Europe, the Middle East, and elsewhere. The 20% of Israeli citizens who identify as Palestinians or Israeli Arabs vote, run for office, hold seats in the Israeli parliament, serve as judges including on Israel's Supreme Court, work as doctors in (not segregated) hospitals, attend (not segregated) universities, eat in (not segregated) restaurants, and relax on (not segregated) beaches. The same is true for Israeli Druze, Christians, Bedouins, Circassians, and other minorities about which HRW appears ignorant. To call that apartheid requires twisting the meaning of the word beyond recognition. In no other countries of the broader Middle East do ethnic and religious minorities enjoy similar rights and freedoms. This means HRW has chosen to apply a separate and unequal standard to Israel. That alone constitutes anti-Semitism. What's more, states throughout the broader Middle East proudly proclaim themselves Arab and/or Muslim. It is only Jewish identity and self-determination that HRW deems a "crime against humanity." It is HRW, not Israel, that has crossed a threshold. The writer is president of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. 2021-05-06 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|